Boards of Appeal symbol


Boards of Appeal

Contact us using an online form

Richard-Reitzner-Allee 8
85540 Haar

All contact information

Boards of Appeal and key decisions conference

14-15 November 2018
EPO Munich

Register now


D 0002/83 () of 20.12.1983

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1983:D000283.19831220
Date of decision: 20 December 1983
Case number: D 0002/83
Application number: -
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: EN
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 106.187K)
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: -
Applicant name: -
Opponent name: -
Board: DBA
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
Keywords: -


Cited decisions:
Citing decisions:

Summary of Facts and Submissions

The appellant was entered in the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office. By letter of 13 December 1979 to the Institute of Professional Representatives, he expressed the wish to resign from the Institute. Deletion of his name from the list of professional representatives, in response to this letter, did not however occur until 1983.

The Institute subscriptions for 1978 and 1979 were paid at the end of 1979 by the firm employing the appellant at the time. Sent reminders in error, he did not clarify the position. Letters from the Disciplinary Board were not received or went unanswered. The outcome was that a fine of DM 800 was imposed on him by Disciplinary Board Decision of 31 January 1983 under Article 4(1) of the Regulation on discipline.

On 12 March 1983, the appellant appealed against this Decision. He apologised and explained what had happened, which further investigation has substantiated. The appellant requests that the contested Decision be set aside.


The appeal is admissible and substantiated. The facts of the case are not such as to justify application of Article 4(2) of the Regulation on discipline, as it is proved that he resigned from the Institute and the subscription had been paid.


For these reasons it is decided that:

The Decision under appeal is set aside.

Quick Navigation