D 0014/93 (Training period) of 05.06.1996
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1996:D001493.19960605
- Date of decision
- 5 June 1996
- Case number
- D 0014/93
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- -
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- -
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- -
- Headnote
The training period pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) REE 1991 for enrolment for the European qualifying examination cannot be served with a legal practitioner whose name does not appear on the list of professional representatives, even if the said legal practitioner is also a patent attorney under national law.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 133(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(7) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(8)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 9 1973Regulation on discipline for professional representatives Art 10Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art 23(4)Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art 7(1)
- Keywords
- Training period under the supervision of a legal practitioner who is also a patent attorney under national law
- Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for a refund of the appeal fee is refused.
3. The request for a refund of the qualifying fee for the European qualifying examination is refused.
4. The request for reimbursement of the travel costs is refused.