D 0014/93 (Training period) of 05.06.1996
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1996:D001493.19960605
- Date of decision
- 5 June 1996
- Case number
- D 0014/93
- Online on
- 1 July 1997
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- -
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- -
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- -
- Headnote
The training period pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) REE 1991 for enrolment for the European qualifying examination cannot be served with a legal practitioner whose name does not appear on the list of professional representatives, even if the said legal practitioner is also a patent attorney under national law.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 9 1973European Patent Convention Art 133(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(7) 1973European Patent Convention Art 134(8)(a) 1973Regulation on discipline for professional representatives Art 10Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art 7(1)Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art 23(4)
- Keywords
- Training period under the supervision of a legal practitioner who is also a patent attorney under national law
- Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for a refund of the appeal fee is refused.
3. The request for a refund of the qualifying fee for the European qualifying examination is refused.
4. The request for reimbursement of the travel costs is refused.