European Patent Office

G 0003/98 (Six-month period/UNIVERSITY PATENTS) of 12.07.2000

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2000:G000398.20000712
Date of decision
12 July 2000
Case number
G 0003/98
Petition for review of
-
Application number
83901021.2
IPC class
A61K 39/245
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Materials and methods for herpes simplex virus vaccination
Applicant name
University Patents, Inc.
Opponent name
SmithKline Beecham Biologicals SA
Board
-
Headnote

For the calculation of the six-month period referred to in Article 55(1) EPC, the relevant date is the date of the actual filing of the European patent application; the date of priority is not to be taken account of in calculating this period.

Relevant legal provisions
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 55(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 89 1973European Patent Convention R 23 1973Paris Convention Art 002Paris Convention Art 004Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 17(2)SPC Art 4
Keywords
Admissibility of referral - significance of the point of law in the appeal proceedings (yes)
Calculation of the six-month period under Art. 55 EPC - relevant date - date of actual filing of the application
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The question of law referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is answered as follows:

For the calculation of the six-month period referred to in Article 55(1) EPC, the relevant date is the date of the actual filing of the European patent application; the date of priority is not to be taken account of in calculating this period.