J 0015/80 (Priority/earlier deposit of industrial design) of 11.06.1981
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1981:J001580.19810611
- Date of decision
- 11 June 1981
- Case number
- J 0015/80
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- -
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Arenhold
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.1.01
- Headnote
I. The provisions of Articles 87 to 89 and Rule 38 EPC together form a complete, self-contained code of rules of law on the subject of claiming priority for the purpose of filing a European patent application.
II. The European Patent Office is not directly bound by Article 4 of the Paris Convention, since the European Patent Organisation is not a party to that Convention.
III. As the EPC is a special agreement within the meaning of Article 19, Paris Convention, a general understanding by the Contracting States of the EPC that the deposit of an industrial design clearly gives a priority right for a national patent application, by application of Article 4 Paris Convention, could lead to an interpretation of Article 87(1) EPC going beyond its terms and permitting such deposits to give priority rights for European patent applications.
IV. In the absence of such a general understanding there is no reason to read Article 87(1) EPC more broadly than its express terms and scope require. It follows that a priority right based on the deposit of an industral design is not recognised for a European patent application.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 87 1973European Patent Convention Art 88 1973European Patent Convention Art 89 1973European Patent Convention R 38 1973Paris Convention Art 004Paris Convention Art 019Patent Cooperation Treaty Art 8(1)Patent Cooperation Treaty R 4.10Strasbourg_Convention
- Keywords
- Priority right
Deposit of industrial design
Industrial design/deposit of
Paris Convention and EPC - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal against the Decision of the Receiving Section dated 23 May 1980 is dismissed.