European Patent Office

J 0001/89 (Courtesy service) of 01.02.1990

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1990:J000189.19900201
Date of decision
1 February 1990
Case number
J 0001/89
Petition for review of
-
Application number
83903170.5
IPC class
A23B 4/02
Language of proceedings
German
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
Liesenfeld
Opponent name
-
Board
3.1.01
Headnote

I.1. The principle of good faith governing relations between the EPO and applicants (J 2/87, OJ EPO 1988, 330 and J 3/87, OJ EPO 1989, 3) also applies to courtesy services provided by the EPO where these are not worded so as to rule out any misunderstanding on the part of a reasonable addressee.

2. An applicant cannot rely on the EPO systematically providing certain courtesy services (in this case reminding him of the due date for payment of renewal fees) and therefore is not entitled to base a claim on their omission (confirmation of J 12/84, OJ EPO 1985, 108); if however the applicant does receive a notification provided by the EPO as a courtesy service, he can rely on its accuracy and completeness.

3. Where an applicant pays renewal fees in accordance with a misleading notification regarding the due date for payment of renewal fees, he is to be treated as if he has paid the renewal fee in due time.

II. If the commencement of the regional (European) phase is deferred until expiry of the 30th month after the filing date of the international application, the renewal fee for the third year is not due until after expiry of the 30th month, i.e. on the last day of the 30-month time limit (New legal position from 1.6.1991 (Rule 104b(1)(e) EPC). (Article 40 PCT; Article 150(2), third sentence, EPC). The period of grace for payment of the renewal fee with an additional fee is then to be calculated on the basis of the deferred due date.

Relevant legal provisions
EPC1973_Art_150(2)_Sent_3European Patent Convention Art 86 1973Patent Cooperation Treaty Art 40
Keywords
Reminder concerning payment of renewal fees
Courtesy service of the EPO
Clarity and unambiguity of communications
Principle of good faith
Due date of the renewal fee for the third year
International application with Chapter II PCT
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The communication pursuant to Rule 69(1) EPC dated 3 November 1987 and the decision of 29 July 1988 are set aside.

2. The fourth-year renewal fee is deemed to have been paid in due time and the European patent application therefore not to have been withdrawn.

3. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for continuation of the grant procedure.