European Patent Office

T 0083/05 (Broccoli/PLANT BIOSCIENCE) of 22.05.2007

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T008305.20070522
Date of decision
22 May 2007
Case number
T 0083/05
Petition for review of
-
Application number
99915886.8
IPC class
A01H 5/10
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Method for selective increase of the anticarcinogenic glucosinolates in Brassica species
Applicant name
Plant Bioscience Limited
Opponent name
Syngenta Participations AG
Groupe Limagrain Holding
Board
3.3.04
Headnote

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:

1. Does a non-microbiological process for the production of plants which contains the steps of crossing and selecting plants escape the exclusion of Article 53(b) EPC merely because it contains, as a further step or as part of any of the steps of crossing and selection, an additional feature of a technical nature?

2. If question 1 is answered in the negative, what are the relevant criteria for distinguishing non-microbiological plant production processes excluded from patent protection under Article 53(b) EPC from non-excluded ones? In particular, is it relevant where the essence of the claimed invention lies and/or whether the additional feature of a technical nature contributes something to the claimed invention beyond a trivial level?

Keywords
Added subject-matter (no)
Sufficiency of disclosure (yes)
Entitlement to priority (yes)
Novelty (yes)
Inventive step (yes)
Exclusion of essentially biological processes for the production of plants - important point of law - referral of questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal
Catchword
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:

1. Does a non-microbiological process for the production of plants which contains the steps of crossing and selecting plants escape the exclusion of Article 53(b) EPC merely because it contains, as a further step or as part of any of the steps of crossing and selection, an additional feature of a technical nature?

2. If question 1 is answered in the negative, what are the relevant criteria for distinguishing non-microbiological plant production processes excluded from patent protection under Article 53(b) EPC from non-excluded ones? In particular, is it relevant where the essence of the claimed invention lies and/or whether the additional feature of a technical nature contributes something to the claimed invention beyond a trivial level?