Boards of Appeal symbol


Boards of Appeal

Contact us using an online form

Richard-Reitzner-Allee 8
85540 Haar

All contact information

Boards of Appeal and key decisions conference

14-15 November 2018
EPO Munich

Register now


T 1772/07 () of 17.3.2008

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T177207.20080317
Date of decision: 17 March 2008
Case number: T 1772/07
Application number: 98957968.5
IPC class: G06F 19/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 15.358K)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: System and method for dynamic profiling of users in one-to-one applications and for validating user rules
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.5.05
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 108
European Patent Convention Art 101(1)
Keywords: Missing statement of Grounds


Cited decisions:
Citing decisions:

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appellant contests the decision of the examining division of the European Patent Office dated 2 May 2007 refusing European patent application No. 98957968.5.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal on 2 July 2007 and paid the appeal fee on the same day.

A written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was not filed within the four-month time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC. Nor did the notice of appeal contain anything that might be considered as such statement.

II. In a communication dated 4 December 2007, the Board informed the appellant that no statement setting out the grounds of appeal had been received and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was informed that any observations should be filed within two months.

III. The appellant filed no observations in response to said communication.

With a facsimile dated 20 February 2008 the appellant informed the Board that no additional documents had been sent after the receipt of the communication of 4 December 2007.

Reasons for the Decision

As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC, the appeal is inadmissible pursuant to Rule 101(1)EPC (Rule 65(1) EPC 1973)


For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.

Quick Navigation