T 1556/09 () of 27.4.2010

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T155609.20100427
Date of decision: 27 April 2010
Case number: T 1556/09
Application number: 04250377.1
IPC class: B65D 81/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 15.650K)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Cartridge system for the preparation of beverages and method of manufacturing said system
Applicant name: Kraft Foods R&D, Inc.
Opponent name: Friesland Brands B.V.
NESTEC S.A.
Board: 3.2.07
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 108 Sent 3
European Patent Convention R 101(1)
Keywords: Missing statement of grounds
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
-

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appeal contests the interlocutory decision of the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office posted 8 May 2009 concerning maintenance of European Patent No. 1 440 909 in amended form.

The appellant (opponent 01) filed a notice of appeal on 17 July 2009 and paid the fee for appeal on the same day.

No statement of grounds was filed.

II. By a communication dated 3 November 2009 sent by registered letter with advice of delivery, the registry of the Board informed the appellant that no statement of grounds had been filed and that its appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible.

The appellant was invited to file observations within two months.

III. No answer has been given to the registry's communication.

Reasons for the Decision

1. The notice of appeal filed on 17 July 2009 contains nothing that could be regarded as a statement of grounds pursuant to Article 108 EPC.

2. As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal has been filed, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible (Article 108 EPC, third sentence, in conjunction with Rule 101(1) EPC).

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.

Quick Navigation