T 0273/84 (Silico-Aluminate) of 21.03.1986
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T027384.19860321
- Date of decision
- 21 March 1986
- Case number
- T 0273/84
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 79400119.8
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- French
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Rhone-Poulenc
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.3.01
- Headnote
Documents introduced for the first time in appeal proceedings following opposition must be taken into consideration when the principle of examination by the EPO of its own motion so requires. Where this is the case it may be appropriate to refer the matter back to the Opposition Division so as to make it possible for the new documents to be examined at two levels of jurisdiction and to avoid one of these being bypassed.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 114 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
- Keywords
- Examination of the EPO of its own motion
Introduction of new documents in appeal proceedings following oppos. - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0500/88T 0626/88T 0110/89T 0538/89T 0588/89T 0638/89T 0675/89T 0140/90T 0295/90T 0862/90T 0315/92T 0466/92T 0121/93T 0337/93T 0970/93T 1016/93T 0035/94T 0136/94T 0184/94T 0730/94T 0151/95T 0167/95T 0223/95T 0585/95T 0503/96T 0690/96T 0968/96T 1060/96T 1069/96T 0111/98T 0767/00T 0402/01T 0334/06
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The impugned decision is set aside.
2. The case is referred back to the Opposition Division for consideration of the opposition to be resumed, with particular attention being paid to the new citation (3) filed with the statement of grounds on 20 November 1984.