T 0816/91 () of 28.8.1995

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T081691.19950828
Date of decision: 28 August 1995
Case number: T 0816/91
Application number: 86107851.7
IPC class: C22B 58/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 89.339K)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Recovery of gallium
Applicant name: SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Opponent name: RHONE-POULENC CHIMIE
Board: 3.2.02

Headnote

-
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 102(a)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(2)
Keywords: Proprietor's request for revocation of the patent
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
T 0073/84
Citing decisions:
-

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. In a decision dated 13 August 1991 the Opposition Division rejected the opposition filed against European patent No. 0 206 081.

II. The Appellant appealed against this decision by a letter filed on 21 October 1991 paid the fee for appeal on the same date and filed a Statement of Grounds of Appeal on 11. december 1991 in which he requested that the patent be revoked.

III. In a reply dated 19 August 1995 to a facsimile of the Registry that the Board intended to summon the parties to attend oral proceedings in January 1996 the Respondent stated as follow:

"The patentee is no longer interested in maintaining the above referenced patent and did therefore not pay the annuity fees which became due in the designated countries. If not yet lapsed, the patentee requests revocation of the European patent."

The EPO has not been informed of the lapse of the patent in the designated states so that the Board has only to deal with the request of revocation of the European patent in suit.

Reasons for the Decision

1. The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 64 EPC and is admissible.

2. Since it follows from the provision according to Article 113(2) EPC that a European patent cannot be maintained against the proprietor's will, the present European patent has, therefore, to be revoked (cf. T 73/84; OJ EPO 1985, 241).

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The European patent No. 0 206 081 is revoked.

Quick Navigation