In J 7/92 the board stated that the purpose of a notification under R. 69(1) EPC 1973 is not to give an applicant a chance to take at least remedial action by way of a request for re-establishment of rights. As stated by the Enlarged Board in its opinion G 1/90 (OJ 1991, 275), when, according to the EPC the European patent application shall be deemed to be withdrawn, the applicant must be "informed" of the loss of rights (R. 69(1) EPC 1973). According to R. 69(2) EPC 1973 he may then, within two months of notification of the communication, apply for a decision "if he considers that the finding of the EPO is inaccurate". Although it is the customary practice of the EPO to send renewal fee reminders, it is in no way compelled to issue such communications. By communicating such information, the EPO provides only a voluntary service from which no rights can be derived (following J 12/84 (OJ 1985, 108). The EPC 1973 did not provide that the EPO should note the loss of rights mentioned in R. 69(1) EPC 1973 within a certain period. Nor did it provide any period of time for the ensuing communication. However, when incoming requests or documents contained clear deficiencies which were obviously easy to correct and could be expected to be remedied within the time limit to avoid a loss of rights, then the principles of good faith might require the EPO to draw attention to such deficiencies (on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations see Chapter III.A).