9.5. Substantial procedural violation
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. A. Appeal procedure
  7. 9. Reimbursement of appeal fees
  8. 9.5. Substantial procedural violation
  9. 9.5.7 Oral proceedings
  10. b) Submissions of parties as response to summons
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

9.5.7 Oral proceedings

Overview

b) Submissions of parties as response to summons 

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 1183/02 (OJ 2003, 404) the board held that a response to a summons to oral proceedings before the examining division which contained good faith responsive amendments and arguments did not stay the summons. Hence omitting to confirm that the summons remained valid did not constitute a substantial procedural violation within the meaning of R. 67 EPC 1973.

In T 343/08 the board stated that there was no general duty for an examining division to provide feedback on an applicant's reply to a summons to oral proceedings, in advance of such oral proceedings.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility