Professional representatives need to file authorisations only in exceptional cases (see Decision of the President of the EPO, Special edition No. 3, OJ EPO 2007, L.1).
Authorisations need be checked only if a party is represented by a person whose authorisation is not apparent from the file. If it is established that the person is either
then no further check is required.
If however the person is:
then the procedure is as follows:
In case (a), the Division will check the file to see whether the previous representative's authorisation has lapsed. If so, no further action is required. If not, the representative concerned will be requested to provide a reference to a registered general authorisation or to file an individual authorisation.
In case (b), the Division will request the person concerned to provide a reference to a registered general authorisation or to file an individual authorisation.
A person without an authorisation will be requested to submit one without delay. If he is unable to do so straight away, a time limit of two months will be set for its submission. The fact that the authorisation was missing, and the time limit set for submitting it, must be recorded in the minutes. The proceedings then continue in the normal way, except that no decision can be pronounced at the end. Instead, the decision is issued in writing once the missing authorisation has been filed. At the end of the proceedings, the party concerned should be reminded to file the authorisation.
The person conducting the proceedings will have the particulars of the persons taking part taken and their authorisations checked, where necessary, before the start of the oral proceedings. Parties and their representatives must identify themselves unless they are known to the person conducting the proceedings or any of the members of the Examining or Opposition Division.