Main Content

URL: Location: HomePatentsLawLegal texts

Guidelines for Examination in the EPO

Guidelines for Examination - Table of Contents  
PART A GUIDELINES FOR FORMALITIES EXAMINATION General Part PART B  
CHAPTER II FILING OF APPLICATIONS AND EXAMINATION ON FILING CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION CHAPTER III EXAMINATION OF FORMAL REQUIREMENTS  
5. Late filing of drawings or parts of the description 4. Examination on filing    
5.4 Missing parts based on priority, no change in filing date 5.3 The filing date changes 5.5 Withdrawal of late-filed missing drawings/parts of the description  
5.4.1 Late-filed missing parts and the priority claim   5.4.2 The missing parts are completely contained in the claimed priority  

5.4.1

Late-filed missing parts and the priority claim

 

In the context of a request under Rule 56(3) the EPO will check that the requirements for the priority claim are met (see III, 6).

 

Where the applicant files a request under Rule 56(3) (see II, 5.4), the priority claim in question must have been in existence no later than the filing of this request. To this end, the applicant can file a simultaneous request, contained in one single submission:

 

(i)

to insert a new priority claim not present when the application was filed according to Rule 52(2), and

 

(ii)

to base late-filed missing parts of the description, or drawings, on that priority claim according to Rule 56(3)

 

This is subject to the proviso that the above simultaneous request respects both the time limit according to Rule 52(2) for insertion of a new priority claim (see III, 6.5.1) and the applicable time limit for making the request according to Rule 56(3) (see whichever of II, 5.1 or II, 5.2. applies). If this is the case, then the requirement under Rule 56(3) that priority be claimed is met (see II, 5.4(ii)).

 

Alternatively, the applicant may file submission (i) earlier (again, provided that it is filed within the time limit according to Rule 52(2)) and then subsequently file submission (ii) (again, provided that it complies with the applicable time limit). However, it is not possible to file request (ii) before request (i), because in this case request (ii) would be filed at a time when there is no priority claim, and it would not meet the requirements of Rule 56(3).

 


Top . arrow top of page

© European Patent Office . Imprint . Terms of use . Last updated: 13.12.2007