The IP landscape in 2025
Watch EPO films on YouTube
8.12.2009
On 4 December 2009 the EU Council reached agreement on a number of key elements constituting the future EU patent 1 system:
The basic concept underlying the future EU patent system is that the EU accedes to the European Patent Convention (EPC) and that the EPO grants EU patents. Such patents will be European patents having unitary effect in the territory of the European Union.
The main outstanding issues to be considered further are:
The general approach to the draft Regulation on the EU patent mainly deals with post grant issues, eg the effects of the EU patent, compulsory licences, or the lapse and invalidity of the EU patent. It does not contain provisions on the translation regime as these will be dealt with in a separate regulation. The general approach will now be submitted to the European Parliament for discussion.
The translation arrangements of the Community patent will form part of a separate regulation to be elaborated on the basis of a proposal of the European Commission. The Regulation on the EU patent should come into force together with the separate regulation on the translation arrangements. The adoption of the latter requires unanimous agreement of the EU Council.
Due to the fact that the EU is intended to accede to the EPC as a contracting party it will be necessary to amend the EPC at a Diplomatic Conference. Furthermore, institutional issues, such as the establishment of a Select Committee of the Administrative Council which is exclusively composed of the EU member states, and the voting rights of the EU and its member states, or the parallel designation of EU member states and the EU in a patent application will have to be regulated in the EPC. The revised EPC will have to be ratified by all EPC contracting states. At present, there are 36 contracting states.
Concerning the renewal fees and their
distribution the EU Council agreed that the Select Committee of the
Administrative Council should, once the Regulation on the EU patent enters into
force, fix both the exact level of the renewal fees and the distribution key
for their allocation. It is foreseen that the EPO retains 50% of the renewal
fee income.
As regards the Enhanced Partnership it is suggested in the conclusions that it should enable the Office to make regular use, where appropriate, of the result of any patent search carried out by a central industrial property office of the EPC contracting states on a national patent application, the priority of which is claimed in a subsequent filing of a European patent application. This utilisation will be carried out in accordance with the already established utilisation scheme of the European Patent Network (EPN) among the EPC states. The Enhanced Partnership should be based on a European Standard for Searches (ESS), containing criteria for ensuring quality which are based on the agreed quality systems of the EPN. In addition to searches, the ESS should include standards on inter alia training, tools, feedback and assessment.
As regards the features of the envisaged unified patent litigation system, it is proposed in the conclusions to establish such a system through an agreement including EU member states and EPC contracting states which are not members of the EU. The envisaged treaty will establish a patent court which has exclusive jurisdiction in respect of infringement and validity issues concerning European and EU patents. This so called "European and EU Patents Court (EEUPC)" should be comprised of a Court of First Instance, a Court of Appeal and a Registry. The Court of First Instance should be comprised of a central division, as well as local and regional divisions in the contracting states to the agreement. The draft agreement is currently being examined by the European Court of Justice which has to deliver an opinion on the compatibility of the draft agreement with the EC Treaty. The opinion is expected at the earliest by summer 2010.
Further information