T 1057/24 of 05.05.2026
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2026:T105724.20260505
- Date of decision
- 5 May 2026
- Case number
- T 1057/24
- Online on
- 3 August 2026
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 17181351.2
- IPC class
- B32B 23/08B32B 15/20B32B 1/08F16L 11/127B32B 15/14F16L 53/38H05B 3/58B32B 27/08F16L 11/08B32B 27/12B32B 5/02B32B 3/28F16L 53/00F16L 11/12B32B 15/18
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Adhesive transfer hose having a barrier layer and method of use
- Applicant name
- Nordson Corporation
- Opponent name
- Baumer hhs GmbH
Focke Meler Gluing Solutions, S.A.
TEAT S.P.A. - Board
- 3.2.05
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 111(2)European Patent Convention Art 116European Patent Convention Art 123(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(6)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15a(1)
- Keywords
- Oral proceedings - request for oral proceedings to be held by videoconference (refused)
Grounds for opposition - added subject-matter (yes)
Amendments - added subject-matter (auxiliary requests 1 to 5, 5a: yes; auxiliary request 5c: no)
Late-filed request - error in use of discretion at first instance (auxiliary request 5b: no)
Late-filed request - admitted (auxiliary request 5b: no; auxiliary request 5c: yes)
Late-filed argument - admitted (yes)
Claims - clarity (auxiliary request 5c: yes)
Late-filed objection - admitted (no)
Remittal (yes) - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- G 0007/93G 0003/14T 0170/87T 0410/91T 0640/91T 0843/91T 0027/94T 0609/94T 0352/05T 1630/08T 0383/11T 0204/22T 1238/22T 2194/22T 1092/23T 0781/24
- Citing cases
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution.