G 0002/91 (Appeal fees) du 29.11.1991
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1991:G000291.19911129
- Date de la décision
- 29 novembre 1991
- Numéro de l'affaire
- G 0002/91
- En ligne le
- 29 novembre 1991
- Requête en révision de
- T 0604/89 du 14.01.1992
- Numéro de la demande
- 81201316.7
- Classe de la CIB
- G01F 1/58
- Langue de la procédure
- Allemand
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- -
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- Krohne AG
- Nom de l'opposant
- Coors, Morgan Matroc, Danfoss, Rosemount
- Chambre
- -
- Sommaire
1. A person who is entitled to appeal but does not do so and instead confines himself to being a party to the appeal proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, has no independent right to continue the proceedings if the appellant withdraws the appeal.
2. Appeal fees cannot be reimbursed simply because several parties to proceedings before the EPO have validly filed an appeal against the same decision.
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 107 1973
- Mots-clés
- Reimbursement of appeal fees where several parties have filed an appeal
- Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that: The point of law referred to the Enlarged Board is answered as follows:
1. A person who is entitled to appeal but does not do so and instead confines himself to being a party to the appeal proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, has no independent right to continue the proceedings if the appellant withdraws the appeal.
2. Appeal fees cannot be reimbursed simply because several parties to proceedings before the EPO have validly filed an appeal against the same decision.