J 0021/09 (Competence of the Legal Board of Appeal/BAUER MASCHINEN GMBH) du 01.08.2011
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:J002109.20110801
- Date de la décision
- 1 août 2011
- Numéro de l'affaire
- J 0021/09
- En ligne le
- 5 août 2011
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 07001768.6
- Classe de la CIB
- E02D 17/13
- Langue de la procédure
- Allemand
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Bodenabtragsvorrichtung
- Nom du demandeur
- BAUER Maschinen GmbH
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.1.01
- Sommaire
The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:
Is a technical board of appeal or the Legal Board of Appeal competent to hear an appeal against an EPO examining division's decision taken separately from its decision granting a patent or refusing the application not to refund search fees under Rule 64(2) EPC?
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 21(3)(a)European Patent Convention Art 21(3)(b)European Patent Convention Art 21(3)(c)European Patent Convention Art 106(2)European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention R 44European Patent Convention R 44(1)European Patent Convention R 62(1)European Patent Convention R 64(2)European Patent Convention R 71(3)European Patent Convention R 103(1)European Patent Convention R 9(3) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Competence of the Legal Board of Appeal
Further search fees not refunded
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0755/14
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:
Is a technical board of appeal or the Legal Board of Appeal competent to hear an appeal against an EPO examining division's decision taken separately from its decision granting a patent or refusing the application not to refund search fees under Rule 64(2) EPC?