European Patent Office

T 0181/82 (Spiro compounds) du 28.02.1984

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1984:T018182.19840228
Date de la décision
28 février 1984
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0181/82
En ligne le
28 février 1984
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
80810093.7
Classe de la CIB
-
Langue de la procédure
Allemand
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
-
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
-
Nom du demandeur
CIBA GEIGY
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.3.01
Sommaire

I. An effect which may be said to be unexpected can be regarded as an indication of inventive step; where comparative tests are sub submitted as evidence of this, there must be the closest possible structural approximation - in a comparable type of use - to the subject-matter of the invention.

II. Only known substances - not notionally described ones - qualify for use in comparisons of compounds. Such substances include those which are the inevitable result of the starting materials and the process applied thereto, even if one of the two reactants manifests itself as a chemical entity (C1 alkyl bromide) from a group of generically defined compounds (C1 - C4 alkyl bromides) (see "Diastereomers" T 12/81, OJ EPO 1982,296).

Mots-clés
Comparative tests - prerequisites therefor
Non-referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal
Inventive step unexpected effect
Exergue
-
Affaires citées
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The request for the case to be remitted to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.