European Patent Office

T 0482/89 (Power supply unit) du 11.12.1990

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T048289.19901211
Date de la décision
11 décembre 1990
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0482/89
En ligne le
15 février 1991
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
84401017.3
Classe de la CIB
H02M 3/335
Langue de la procédure
Français
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
-
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
-
Nom du demandeur
TELEMECHANIQUE
Nom de l'opposant
Siemens Nixdorf
Chambre
3.5.02
Sommaire

I. Under Article 117(1)(c) EPC, in any proceedings before, inter alia, an Opposition Division or a Board of Appeal, the means of giving or of taking evidence may include the production of documents. As the EPC neither defines the term "documents" nor gives any indication of the probative value of such documents, the principle of free evaluation of evidence applies. Any kind of document therefore, regardless of its nature, is admissible during proceedings, including appeal proceedings, before the European Patent Office. The probative value of any such document, however, depends on the peculiar circumstances of the particular case.

II. The principle of free evaluation of evidence also applies to the hearing of witnesses under Article 117(1)(d) EPC. In particular, the EPC does not rule out hearing an employee of one of the parties to the proceedings as a witness.

III. It is a principle well-established in the case law of the majority of Contracting States that a single sale is sufficient to render the article sold available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC, provided the buyer is not bound by an obligation to maintain secrecy. It is not necessary to prove that others also had knowledge of the relevant article.

Mots-clés
Lack of novelty on account of prior use
Sale without obligation to maintain secrecy
Documents produced by opponents admissible as evidence
Testimony of opponents' employee
New claim filed during oral proceedings inadmissible
Exergue
-
Affaires citées
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.