European Patent Office

T 0933/92 (Sensor) du 06.12.1993

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T093392.19931206
Date de la décision
6 décembre 1993
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0933/92
En ligne le
6 décembre 1993
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
89904000.0
Classe de la CIB
G01P 41/00
Langue de la procédure
Allemand
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
-
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Sensor zur Erfassung eines Bewegungsparameters, z.B. Crashsensor eines Kfz
Nom du demandeur
Siemens
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.4.01
Sommaire

The following points of law shall be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:

1. In an appeal from a decision of an Examining Division in which a violation of one or more specified requirements of the EPC has been relied upon as the ground for refusal of a European patent application, when examining the appeal under Article 110 EPC does the Board of Appeal have either the obligation or the power to examine whether the application meets other requirements of the EPC which the Examining Division regarded as having been met in the examination proceedings and which have not therefore been relied upon in its decision as grounds for refusal of the patent application?

2. If a Board of Appeal does not have such an obligation but has such power, under what circumstances should it use such power?

Mots-clés
Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal (yes)
Examination of appeal - extent - reformatio in peius
Exergue
-
Affaires citantes
T 0915/93

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following points of law shall be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:

"1. In an appeal from a decision of an Examining Division in which a violation of one or more specified requirements of the EPC has been relied upon as the ground for refusal of a European patent application, when examining the appeal under Article 110 EPC does the Board of Appeal have either the obligation or the power to examine whether the application meets other requirements of the EPC which the Examining Division regarded as having been met in the examination proceedings and which have not therefore been relied upon in its decision as grounds for refusal of the patent application?

2. If a Board of Appeal does not have such an obligation but has such power, under what circumstances should it use such power?"