14-15 November 2018
|European Case Law Identifier:||ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T113607.20090109|
|Date of decision:||09 January 2009|
|Case number:||T 1136/07|
|IPC class:||A23C 9/15|
|Language of proceedings:||EN|
|Download and more information:||
|Title of application:||Method for preparing solid milk product|
|Applicant name:||Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC|
|Relevant legal provisions:||
|Keywords:||Process Claims: Novelty, inventive step (yes)|
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. European patent application No. 02 250 320.5 entitled "Method for preparing solid milk product" filed on 17 January 2002 in the name of Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc., now Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC and published as EP 1 226 759, was refused by the Examining Division with its decision orally announced on 18 January 2007 and issued in writing on 6 February 2007.
The decision was based on a set of Claims 1 to 19 according to the main request, a set of Claims 1 to 19 according to auxiliary request 1 and a set of Claims 1 to 18 according to auxiliary request 2.
All sets of claims included identical process Claims 1 to 12, which were directed to a method for preparing a solid milk product, and subsequent product claims comprising an independent product Claim 13 directed to a solid milk product differently characterised in each of the requests.
II. In its decision the Examining Division acknowledged novelty and inventive step of the process claimed in Claims 1 to 12 according to the main, first and second auxiliary requests but considered the product of Claims 13 of all requests to be unclear, contrary to the provisions of Article 84 EPC.
III. On 10 April 2007 the Applicant (hereinafter: the Appellant) filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division. The Statement of the Grounds of Appeal was submitted on 15 June 2007. A corrected page 6 of the appeal grounds was filed with the letter dated 18 June 2007.
With its letter dated 2 January 2009 the Appellant filed four new sets of claims as bases for a main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 3.
The main, first and second auxiliary requests essentially corresponded to the respective requests submitted during the examination proceedings including identical process Claims 1 to 12, an independent product Claim 13 and subsequent dependent product claims.
The set of claims according to the third auxiliary request consisted only of the process Claims 1 to 12.
IV. In the oral proceedings, held on 9 January 2009, the issue of lack of clarity of the product claims according to the main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 2 was discussed. In the course of the discussion, the Board informed the Appellant that these requests were not allowable because of lack of clarity of the product claims.
Thereafter, the Appellant withdrew the main request and the auxiliary requests 1 and 2 and requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of auxiliary request 3 filed on 2 January 2009.
Reasons for the Decision
1. The appeal is admissible.
2. The Board concurs with the view of the Examining Division taken in the appealed decision that the process claimed in Claims 1 to 12 according to the third request is novel over the cited documents and is also non-obvious over the disclosure therein; the main reason being that these citations neither disclose nor suggest the manufacture of a solid milk product as claimed by the specified high shear treatment at the specified temperature conditions.
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division with the order to grant a European patent on the basis of Claims 1 to 12 filed as auxiliary request 3 on 2 January 2009, after any necessary consequential amendments of the description.