|European Case Law Identifier:||ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T222809.20100610|
|Date of decision:||10 June 2010|
|Case number:||T 2228/09|
|IPC class:||G06F 12/06
|Language of proceedings:||EN|
|Download and more information:||
|Title of application:||Page table walker which positions a sliding field in a virtual address using page size|
|Applicant name:||Idea Corporation|
|Relevant legal provisions:||
|Keywords:||Missing statement of grounds of appeal|
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appellant contests the decision of the examining division of the European Patent Office dated 8 June 2009 refusing European patent application No. 98906108.0.
The appellant filed a notice of appeal on 17 August 2009 and paid the appeal fee on the same day.
The notice of appeal contains an auxiliary request for oral proceedings.
A written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was not filed within the four-month time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC. Nor did the notice of appeal contain anything that might be considered as such a statement.
II. In a communication dated 1 December 2009, the Board informed the appellant that no statement setting out the grounds of appeal had been received and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was informed that any observations should be filed within two months.
III. In a letter dated 7 January 2010 the appellant declared that the auxiliary request for oral proceedings had not been intended to apply to the question of inadmissibility of the appeal as a consequence of the fact that a written statement of grounds of appeal had not been filed.
The appellant filed no further observations in response to said communication.
Reasons for the Decision
As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC, the appeal is inadmissible pursuant to Rule 101(1) EPC.
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.