T 1618/16 (Context information/QUALCOMM) of 1.2.2017

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T161816.20170201
Date of decision: 01 February 2017
Case number: T 1618/16
Application number: 06848700.8
IPC class: G06F17/30
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 220.865K)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Techniques to generate context information
Applicant name: Qualcomm Incorporated
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.5.07
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 108 (2007)
European Patent Convention R 99(2) (2007)
European Patent Convention R 101(1) (2007)
Keywords: Admissibility of appeal (no)
Admissibility of appeal - missing statement of grounds


Cited decisions:
Citing decisions:

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appeal is directed against the decision of the Examining Division to refuse European patent application No. 06848700.8 announced in oral proceedings on 3 December 2015, the written reasons of which were posted on 22 January 2016.

II. The applicant filed a notice of appeal on 17 March 2016 and paid the appeal fee on the same day.

III. By communication of 10 August 2016, sent by registered letter with advice of delivery (the receipt of which was confirmed by the appellant on 3 November 2016), the Registry of the Board informed the appellant that it appeared from the file that the written statement of grounds of appeal had not been filed, and that it was therefore to be expected that the appeal would be rejected as inadmissible pursuant to Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rule 101(1) EPC. The appellant was informed that any observations had to be filed within two months of notification of the communication.

IV. No reply was received within the deadline set.

Reasons for the Decision

No written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided by Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rule 126(2) EPC. In addition, neither the notice of appeal nor any other document filed contains anything that could be regarded as a statement of grounds pursuant to Article 108 EPC and Rule 99(2) EPC. Therefore, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible (Rule 101(1) EPC).


For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.

Quick Navigation