T 1519/19 09-09-2019
Download and more information:
PULSE ANALYZER
Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Centre Europe B.V.
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
I. On 15 February 2019, the Applicants filed a notice of appeal against the decision to refuse the patent application, which was notified on 16 December 2018. The appeal fee was paid the same day.
II. No statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed.
III. By communication of 29 May 2019, the appellants' attention was drawn to the missing statement of grounds, and to the legal consequence that the appeal was likely to be rejected as inadmissible. Any observations would have to be filed within two months of notification of the communication.
IV. No such observations were submitted.
No written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit of Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rules 99 (2) and 126(2) EPC. Therefore, the appeal is rejected as inadmissible (Rule 101(1) EPC).
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.