T 0401/88 (Test piece) of 28.02.1989
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T040188.19890228
- Date of decision
- 28 February 1989
- Case number
- T 0401/88
- Online on
- 21 March 1989
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 84116226.6
- IPC class
- G01R 31/36
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Bosch
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.4.01
- Headnote
A requested amendment which represents an inadmissible extension within the meaning of Article 123(2) EPC cannot be allowed as a correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC. An error may be corrected only if a skilled person would regard the correction as necessarily implied by the contents of the documents as originally filed - in the same way as when the admissibility of an amendment under Article 123(2) EPC is assessed. This follows both from Article 138(1)(c) EPC, under which a European patent is revoked if its subject-matter extends beyond the content of the application as filed, and from Article 164(2) EPC, which stipulates that the provisions of the Convention take precedence over those of the Implementing Regulations (see point 2.2 of the Reasons and T 13/83 - 3.3.1 "Polyisocyanurate/ICI Americas, 13 April 1984, OJ EPO 1984, 428).
- Relevant legal provisions
- EPC1973_R_088_Sent_2European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 138(1)(c) 1973European Patent Convention Art 164(2) 1973
- Keywords
- Amendment of claim - omission of a feature - inadmissible
Amendment of claim - correction of errors - inadmissible - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.