4.5. Diagnostic methods
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. B. Exceptions to patentability
  7. 4. Medical methods
  8. 4.5. Diagnostic methods
  9. 4.5.1 Opinion G 1/04 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.5.1 Opinion G 1/04 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Overview

4.5.1 Opinion G 1/04 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

The President of the EPO made a referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on points of law relating to the interpretation of the term "diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body". The Enlarged Board of Appeal emphasised in opinion G 1/04 (OJ 2006, 334) that its interpretation of the scope of the exclusion from patentability under Art. 52(4) EPC 1973 in respect of diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body would remain valid under the EPC 2000.

a) What constitutes "diagnostic methods"
b) Involvement of practitioner
c) The criterion "practised on the human or animal body"
d) Clarity of a claim relating to diagnostic methods
e) Intermediate findings of diagnostic relevance
Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility