3. Availability to the public
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. C. Novelty
  7. 3. Availability to the public
  8. 3.4. Obligation to maintain secrecy
  9. 3.4.3 Distribution of prospectuses, technical descriptions
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.4. Obligation to maintain secrecy

Overview

3.4.3 Distribution of prospectuses, technical descriptions

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 173/83 (OJ 1987, 465) and T 958/91 the board held that a technical description sent out to clients could not be regarded as secret information.

The board in T 2056/13 held, in relation to an operating manual with a copyright notice, that such notices did not normally imply an obligation to maintain secrecy. That there had been none in this particular case was anyway clear from the manual itself, which mentioned the possibility of its sale and dissemination and was therefore prior art for the purposes of Art. 54(2) EPC. (Argument of the opponent that copyright protection does not necessarily imply that the content is confidential rejected by the board in the circumstances of the case T 1570/14 – a joint development project.)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility