9. Assessment of inventive step
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. D. Inventive step
  7. 9. Assessment of inventive step
  8. 9.19. Examples of lack of inventive step
  9. 9.19.12 Animal testing and human clinical trials
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

9.19. Examples of lack of inventive step

Overview

9.19.12 Animal testing and human clinical trials

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 1493/09 the board found that the skilled person seeking to solve the problem formulated (provision of a broadly effective vaccine against HPV, especially providing broad protection against cervical cancer) would have considered not only formulations for immediate use in human clinical trials but also additional animal testing. It took the view that its assessment according to the problem and solution approach applied for the same reasons to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 (directed to the second medical use of the vaccine composition and including the therapeutic effect "prevention or treatment of a disorder related to HPV infection" as an explicit feature), and concluded accordingly that it too lacked inventive step.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility