6. Reproducibility
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. II. Patent application and amendments
  6. C. Sufficiency of disclosure
  7. 6. Reproducibility
  8. 6.6. Reproducibility without undue burden
  9. 6.6.3 Wrong citations
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

6.6. Reproducibility without undue burden

Overview

6.6.3 Wrong citations

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

Wrongly citing a method of measuring an essential product parameter may constitute insufficient disclosure (T 1250/01, applied in T 484/05 (unusual parameter)). In T 1250/01 the consequence of an error in the description was that no method for measuring an essential parameter was disclosed and, thus, the skilled person was not able to make any measurement of the relevant essential parameter (decision cited in T 206/08 (detergent compositions) but found inapplicable to the case in hand).

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility