1.3. Standard for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. II. Patent application and amendments
  6. E. Amendments
  7. 1. ‍‍Article 123(2) EPC
  8. 1.3. Standard for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  9. 1.3.6 Criteria not relevant for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  10. a) Obviousness
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

1.3.6 Criteria not relevant for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC

Overview

a) Obviousness 

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 823/96 the board observed that, whilst common general knowledge must be taken into account in deciding what is clearly and unambiguously implied by the explicit disclosure of a document, the question of what may be rendered obvious by that disclosure in the light of common general knowledge is not relevant to the assessment of what is implied by the disclosure of that document. On the contrary, these two questions must be strictly separated.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility