6.1. Fixing or changing the date for oral proceedings
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. C. Oral proceedings
  7. 6. Preparation of oral proceedings
  8. 6.1. Fixing or changing the date for oral proceedings
  9. 6.1.4 Reasons submitted in a request for postponement
  10. k) Proceedings before a national court
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

6.1.4 Reasons submitted in a request for postponement

Overview

k) Proceedings before a national court 

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 392/97 the board ruled that the subsequent appointment of oral proceedings by a national patent court to take place on the same date as the previously appointed oral proceedings before the board was not in itself a sufficient reason for adjournment.

In T 228/09 the board considered, having regard to Art. 2.2 of the 2007 Notice, that unforeseen infringement proceedings could not generally be regarded as an acceptable ground for adjournment.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility