3. Non-observance of time limit directly causing a loss of right
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. E. Re-establishment of rights
  7. 3. Non-observance of time limit directly causing a loss of right
  8. 3.1. The meaning of "time limit"
  9. 3.1.2 Designation of States
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.1. The meaning of "time limit"

Overview

3.1.2 Designation of States

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In J 3/83 the Legal Board explained that the concept of a time limit within Art. 122 EPC 1973 involved a period of time of a certain duration. In the case of designation of states, there was no such period. States had to be designated at a particular time, see Art. 79(1) EPC 1973. With the EPC 2000 this is no longer an issue, as under the current Art. 79(1) EPC all contracting states party to the EPC at the time when the application is filed are deemed to be designated in the request for grant of a European patent.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility