5. Oral submissions by an accompanying person
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. V. Representation
  7. 5. Oral submissions by an accompanying person
  8. 5.2. Application of the case law established by the Enlarged Board
  9. 5.2.9 Procedural objection under R. 106 EPC
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5.2. Application of the case law established by the Enlarged Board

Overview

5.2.9 Procedural objection under R. 106 EPC

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In R 3/08 the question arose whether an accompanying person can validly raise a procedural objection pursuant to R. 106 EPC. However, in the circumstances this question did not need to be answered since, based on the affidavit of Mr S.L., it was credible that the professional representative himself explicitly supported his procedural objections. Even if, in the absence of further evidence, the exact circumstances of the representative's intervention was not established, the board was prepared to assume in favour of the petitioner that the objections raised in that phase of the oral proceedings met the requirements of R. 106 EPC.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility