2. The first stage of substantive examination
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. IV. Proceedings before the departments of first instance
  6. B. Examination procedure
  7. 2. The first stage of substantive examination
  8. 2.6. Amendments under Rule 137(3) EPC
  9. 2.6.2 Consent under Rule 137(3) EPC in oral proceedings
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.6. Amendments under Rule 137(3) EPC

Overview

2.6.2 Consent under Rule 137(3) EPC in oral proceedings

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

R. 116(2) EPC supplements R. 137(3) EPC with a special provision on amendments to the application where oral proceedings are to be held, under which the examining division has discretion to disregard such amendments if they are not filed before the date fixed in the summons to such proceedings. However, whilst meeting the time limit for filing further requests for amendments to the application fixed in the summons under R. 116 EPC does not render R. 137(3) EPC inapplicable, requests filed by that time limit can only be refused under R. 137(3) EPC in a proper exercise of discretion (T 937/09, T 2294/12).

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility