2. The first stage of substantive examination
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. IV. Proceedings before the departments of first instance
  6. B. Examination procedure
  7. 2. The first stage of substantive examination
  8. 2.8. Issue of a further communication under Article 113(1) EPC
  9. 2.8.7 Form of the communication under Article 113(1) EPC
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.8. Issue of a further communication under Article 113(1) EPC

Overview

2.8.7 Form of the communication under Article 113(1) EPC

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In T 1237/07 the board pointed out that the right to present comments enshrined in Art. 113(1) EPC 1973 did not necessarily need to be exercised in writing but could be satisfied by way of oral proceedings.

In T 497/02 the board found that Art. 113(1) EPC 1973 merely requires applicants to be afforded the opportunity to present their comments on the grounds on which the EPO bases its decision: it does not require a written communication nor does it specify how much time applicants should be afforded to consider and present their comments.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility