7.7. Remittal following fundamental deficiencies
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. A. Appeal procedure
  7. 7. Remittal to the department of first instance
  8. 7.7. Remittal following fundamental deficiencies
  9. 7.7.2 Fundamental deficiencies
  10. b) Reasons for decision deficient
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

7.7.2 Fundamental deficiencies

Overview

b) Reasons for decision deficient 

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

R. 111(2) EPC gives parties to EPO proceedings a fundamental procedural right to be provided with the reasons for a decision (J 18/16). Lack of compliance with R. 111(2) EPC is a fundamental deficiency, which, according to Art. 11 RPBA 2007, should lead to an immediate remittal of the case to the department of first instance, unless special reasons present themselves for doing otherwise (T 2275/15; see also T 1553/07, T 546/10 (decision based on the state of the file), T 2393/11, T 2245/12, T 395/13, T 2424/13, T 591/17, T 1922/17). For more details, see chapter III.K.3. "Form of decisions".

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility