3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. B. Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  7. 3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  8. 3.7. Contents of the petition for review
  9. 3.7.2 Non-compliance with Rule 107 EPC and failure to remedy a deficiency
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.7. Contents of the petition for review

Overview

3.7.2 Non-compliance with Rule 107 EPC and failure to remedy a deficiency

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

In R 6/10 the board held that if a petition did not comply with R. 107(2) EPC, it must be rejected as inadmissible.

Under R. 108(2) EPC, if the Enlarged Board of Appeal notes that the petition does not comply with R. 107(1)(a) EPC, it shall invite the petitioner to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period to be specified. If the deficiencies are not remedied in due time, the Enlarged Board of Appeal shall reject the petition as inadmissible. In R 6/09 the Enlarged Board noted that such rejection was subject to the petitioner's request for re-establishment of rights.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility