4. Grounds for petition for review
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. B. Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  7. 4. Grounds for petition for review
  8. 4.3. ‍‍Article 112a(2)(c) EPC
  9. 4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advance
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.3. ‍‍Article 112a(2)(c) EPC – alleged fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC

Overview

4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advance

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

It is settled case law that a board of appeal is not required to provide the parties in advance with all foreseeable arguments in favour of or against a request (R 1/08 with reference to G 6/95, OJ 1996, 649; see also R 13/09, R 18/09, R 4/13, R 5/15, R 6/16). In other words, parties are not entitled to advance indications of all reasons for a decision in detail (see e.g. R 12/09 of 15 January 2010 date: 2010-01-15, R 15/09, R 4/11, R 18/12, R 2/13, R 9/14, R 7/15, R 8/17). This principle also applies to an interpretation of a passage in the state of the art forming only part of such reasons (R 19/11, R 15/12, R 16/13).

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility