2. European qualifying examination
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. C. Proceedings before the Disciplinary Board of Appeal
  7. 2. European qualifying examination
  8. 2.6. Appeals against decisions of the Examination Board and the Examination Secretariat
  9. 2.6.5 Legitimate interest
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.6. Appeals against decisions of the Examination Board and the Examination Secretariat

Overview

2.6.5 Legitimate interest

You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here

According to the established case law, a candidate who appealed against failing the EQE but resat and passed it before the appeal had been decided still retained a legitimate interest in pursuing the appeal. This was confirmed in D 3/98. Any other view would amount to denying him recourse to the law; legitimate interest would then depend on how long proceedings took. However, appellants could exert little influence over that, and should therefore not have to suffer the consequences. Whether there was a legitimate interest was to be determined with reference to the date the proceedings were initiated (in this case, on the day the appeal was filed).

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility