Frequently, members of the same patent family are published in a number of different languages. Consequently, the examiner has a choice regarding the language of the document which is cited in the search report. If the relevant technical content does not differ between the various family members and they are all published before the earliest priority date of the application, then all of the members of the family are of equal relevance to the application. In such cases, the examiner should choose the document to be cited by virtue of its language of publication and according to the following list, the most preferred language being given first:
In the cases (2) and (3), the examiner might consider citing an abstract in an official language of the EPO, instead of the original document.
If the original document is in a less "accessible" language (e.g. Chinese or Russian), it is best to cite the abstract. In some cases whereit is possible to obtain an automated translation of certain patent documents into an official language of the EPO(e.g. Russian patents from the Russian website),. If the examiner relies on thismay choose to annex that translation toin the search opinion, he should send it to the applicant by annexing a copy of the automated translation to the search opinion (see B‑X, 12, and G‑IV, 4).
Alternatively, if only a specific paragraph of the translation is needed, the examiner may copy the translation of that paragraph into the search opinion instead of annexing the entire translation. Non-official translations (i.e. translations having no legal value) of publications in "less accessible" languages should not be cited in the search report.