2. Form and content of claims
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part F
  6. Chapter IV
  7. 2. Form and content of claims
  8. 2.3 Two-part form unsuitable
  9. 2.3.2 Two-part form "wherever appropriate"
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.3 Two-part form unsuitable

Overview

2.3.2 Two-part form "wherever appropriate" 

A revised version of this publication entered into force.

When examining whether or not a claim is to be put in the form provided for in Rule 43(1), second sentence, it is important to assess whether this form is "appropriate". In this respect the purpose of the two-part form is to allow the skilled person to see clearly which features necessary for the definition of the claimed subject-matter are, in combination, part of the prior art. If this is sufficiently clear from the indication of prior art made in the description, to meet the requirement of Rule 42(1)(b), the two-part form is not insisted upon.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility