4. Clarity and interpretation of claims
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part F
  6. Chapter IV
  7. 4. Clarity and interpretation of claims
  8. 4.5 Essential features
  9. 4.5.3 Generalisation of essential features
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.5 Essential features

Overview

4.5.3 Generalisation of essential features 

A revised version of this publication entered into force.

In deciding how specific the essential features must be, the provisions of Art. 83 must be borne in mind: it is sufficient if the application as a whole describes the necessary characteristics of an invention in a degree of detail such that a person skilled in the art can perform the invention (see F‑III, 3). It is not necessary to include all details of the invention in the independent claim. Thus a certain degree of generalisation of the claimed features may be permitted, provided that the claimed generalised features as a whole allow the problem to be solved. In this case a more specific definition of the features is not required. This principle applies equally to structural and functional features.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility