Chapter V – Allowability of amendments – examples
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part H
  6. Chapter V
  7. 3. Amendments in claims
  8. 3.4 Further cases of broadening of claims
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3. Amendments in claims

Overview

3.4 Further cases of broadening of claims 

A revised version of this publication entered into force.

The deletion of a statement regarding use or intended purpose in an independent product claim fulfils the requirements of Art. 123(2) only if the application as filed offers a basis for the assumption that the product can also be used in some other way (and if the statement of purpose does not amount to a functional limitation).

The broadening of a claim by exchanging a particular feature for a more general feature cannot be based on an indication that it would be obvious for a skilled person (see also H‑V, 3.2.1).

Art. 123(2)

Moreover, the deletion of a particular feature or its replacement by a more general feature usually leads to a broadening of the claim. Therefore, the requirements of Art. 123(3) are not fulfilled.

Art. 123(3)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility