European Patent Office

J 0012/01 (Request for reimbursement of appeal fee/HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES) of 26.03.2003

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2003:J001201.20030326
Date of decision
26 March 2003
Case number
J 0012/01
Petition for review of
-
Application number
96306765.7
IPC class
D04B 9/44
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Bias-cut, knit cover for a belt, hose or the like
Applicant name
HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.1.01
Headnote

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

1. In the event of interlocutory revision, does the department of first instance whose decision has been appealed, have the power to refuse a request for reimbursement of the appeal fee, and if so, is such refusal a final or an appealable decision?

2. If a department of first instance, not having that power, refers the request for reimbursement of the appeal fee to the Boards of Appeal for decision, how should the competent board be constituted?

Keywords
Interlocutory revision - refusal of the request for reimbursement of the appeal fee - power of the department of first instance - composition of the possibly competent board of appeal - referral to the Enlarged Board
Catchword
-
Citing cases
G 0001/11J 0021/09

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

1. In the event of interlocutory revision, does the department of first instance whose decision has been appealed, have the power to refuse a request for reimbursement of the appeal fee, and if so, is such refusal a final or an appealable decision?

2. If a department of first instance, not having that power, refers the request for reimbursement of the appeal fee to the Boards of Appeal for decision, how should the competent board be constituted?