Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    EPO TIR study-PV-web-720 x 237

    Technology insight report on advances in photovoltaics

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0664/03 20-10-2004
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0664/03 20-10-2004

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2004:T066403.20041020
Date of decision
20 October 2004
Case number
T 0664/03
Petition for review of
-
Application number
92917586.7
IPC class
B32B 27/08
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 35.61 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Pouch for packaging flowable materials

Applicant name
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Opponent name

DUPONT CANADA INC.

ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.

Board
3.3.09
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973
European Patent Convention R 88 1973
Keywords
Main request and 1st to 5th auxiliary requests: amendments - added subject-matter (yes) - correction of obvious error (no)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0003/89
Citing decisions
-

I. Appeal was lodged by the Patentee on 20 June 2003 against the decision of the Opposition Division revoking European patent No. 0 598 017 following filing of two oppositions.

II. The decision under appeal was based on Claims 1 to 6 of a main request and Claims 1 to 3 of an auxiliary request. Claim 1 of the main request read as follows:

"Use of (a) from 10 to 100 percent by weight of at least one ultra low density linear ethylene copolymer interpolymerized from ethylene and at least one alpha- olefin in the range of C3-C10 and having a density of from 0.89 to 0.915 g/cm3, and a melt index of less than 10.0 g/10 minutes, and (b) from 0 to 90 percent by weight of at least one polymer selected from the group consisting of a linear copolymer of ethylene and a C3- C18-alpha-olefin having a density of greater than 0.916 g/cm3 and a melt index of from 0.1 to 10 g/10 minutes, a high-pressure low density polyethylene having a density of from 0.916 to 0.930 g/cm3 and a melt index of from 0.1 to 10 g/10 minutes and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer having a weight ratio of ethylene to vinyl acetate from 2.2:1 to 24:1 and a melt index of from 0.2 to 10 g/10 minutes; in a heat seal layer (I) of a film structure for a pouch container to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C, wherein the hot tack strength is at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m), which film structure may optionally comprise

(II) at least one layer of a linear low density ethylene-C3-C18-alpha-olefin copolymer having a density of from 0.916 to 0.935 and a melt index of from 0.1 to 10 g/10 minutes, the film structure having a hot tack strength initiation temperature of less than 100°C as measured according to the method described in Example 25."

III. The Opposition Division held that Claim 1 according to the main request did not comply with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC because the feature "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C, wherein the hot tack strength is at least 1.0 N/inch" did not have a basis in the application documents as filed.

IV. With the Statement of the grounds of appeal filed on 1 September 2003, the Appellant resubmitted the two sets of claims according to the main and the auxiliary requests underlying the decision under appeal and filed four further sets of claims, as well as an affidavit of Lloyd Kovacs dated 28 August 2003.

V. At the oral proceedings held on 20 October 2004, the Appellant re-filed the afore-mentioned six sets of claims as basis for a main request and five auxiliary requests, thus clarifying their respective ranking.

Claim 1 of the main request is identical to Claim 1 of the main request on which the decision under appeal was based.

Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request corresponds to Claim 1 of the main request, with the exception that the feature regarding the hot tack sealing range was amended to read "to broaden the temperature range over which a hot tack strength of at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) is achieved, wherein the hot tack strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C"

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request corresponds to Claim 1 of the main request, with the exception that, at the end of the claim, the film structure was not further defined as "having a hot tack strength initiation temperature of less than 100°C as measured according to the method described in Example 25" but instead, as "having a hot tack strength of at least 1 N/inch (39.4 N/m) as measured at a seal bar temperature of 110°C and at a sealing time of less than 0.2 seconds according to the method described in Example 26".

Claim 1 of the third auxiliary request corresponds to Claim 1 of the second request, with the exception that the feature regarding the hot tack sealing range was amended to read "to broaden the temperature range over which a hot tack seal of a hot tack strength of at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) is achieved, wherein the hot tack seal strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C".

Claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request corresponds to Claim 1 of the second request, with the exception that the upper limit of the heat sealing range is 130°C instead of 140°C.

Claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request corresponds to Claim 1 of the third request, with the exception that the upper limit of the heat sealing range is 130°C instead of 140°C.

VI. The Appellant's arguments may be summarised as follows:

- In the light of the information in the description of the opposed patent, the person skilled in the art would not interpret the feature "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C (or 130°C)" in the sense that the temperature range of from 70°C to 140°C (or 130°C) was the range to which the hot tack sealing range was broadened to.

- The skilled person would rather interpret that feature as "to broaden the temperature range over which a hot tack seal strength of at least 1.0 N/inch is achieved, wherein the hot tack seal strength is measured over a heat sealing range of 70°C to 140°C (or 130°C)".

- This interpretation was based on the description as filed, in particular Example 25, Tab. VIII and Figure 7 and 8 and would justify a correction under Rule 88 EPC.

VII. The Respondents' submissions were essentially the following:

- The conditions for correction under Rule 88 EPC were not met, because neither did granted Claim 1, and especially the feature concerning the broadening of the hot tack sealing range, comprise an obvious error, nor was there an apparent inconsistency of this feature with the description.

- The obvious interpretation of the claims was that made by the Opposition Division.

- The different interpretation given by the Appellant was objectionable because it departed from the primary meaning of the words in the claims.

- The amended claims according to the main and the first three auxiliary requests still contravened Article 123(2) EPC since there was no disclosure in the application documents of measuring the hot tack sealing strength over the temperature range of from 70°C to 140°C.

- Regarding Claim 1 of the auxiliary requests four and five, it was an improper generalisation to take the measurement range of from 70°C to 130°C out of the context of Example 25.

VIII. The Appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the case be remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution under Article 100(b) and 100(a) EPC, on the basis of the main request or, alternatively of anyone of the five auxiliary requests all submitted during the oral proceedings.

The Respondents requested that the appeal be dismissed.

1. Main request

1.1 It is common ground that the phrasing "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C, wherein the hot tack strength is at least 1.0 N/inch" was not contained in the application documents as filed.

1.2 With the above feature, Claim 1 can be literally interpreted as being essentially directed to the use of a defined ultra low density linear ethylene copolymer (ULDPE) in a heat seal layer with the result that the hot tack sealing range of the film structure comprising that heat seal layer is broadened as compared to the case where such ULDPE is not used. More specifically, the hot tack sealing range of the film structure shall be broadened to cover the (entire) heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C. As indicated in the decision under appeal and not refuted by the Appellant, there is no basis in the application documents as filed for a hot tack sealing range of a ULDPE heat seal layer of from 70°C to 140°C.

1.3 The question is therefore as to whether, in the light of the description as originally filed and, if necessary, using common general knowledge, the skilled person would give to this feature a different interpretation that complies with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC. In this respect, the Appellant referred to the text of Example 25 where it is indicated that "the temperature between Hot Tack Ti and the temperature of maximum Hot Tack Strength indicates the size of the hot tack sealing range", the Hot Tack Initiation Temperature ("Hot Tack Ti") being "the lowest temperature at which a seal is formed. A seal force of 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) was selected as the force required to form an adequate seal, and therefore, Hot Tack Ti is found at a force of 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m)." (page 25, lines 28 to 31 and page 26, lines 5 to 6).

The Board notes that the test data shown in Table VIII reveal that the hot tack sealing ranges for the tested samples are indeed narrower than the range of 70°C to 140°C stipulated in Claim 1. However, this fact does not mean that Example 25 is in contradiction with the wording of Claim 1. In fact, it is not unusual in the art to formulate a Claim which encompasses the examples but which is not restricted to these only. Thus, based on the description, including Example 25, the skilled person would not have any reason to suspect that the feature "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C" was to be interpreted differently from its literal meaning.

1.4 Finally, at the oral proceedings, the Appellant mentioned that the Hot Tack Seal Initiation Temperature Ti was a new parameter coined by the Appellant upon the discovery of a relationship between the hot tack initiation temperature and the density of the polymer used for making the heat seal layer. As a consequence, the term "hot tack seal range" is also new. In such a case, there is no general common knowledge on which the skilled person may fall back in order to interpret the wording of Claim 1.

1.5 The Board does not ignore the affidavit by Mr Kovacs, in which it is asserted "that the claims do not mean that the ethylene copolymer has a heat seal of at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/) when sealing is carried out at a temperature anywhere within a window as broad as the range of from 70°C to 140°C" (see point 11 of the affidavit). However, he has not given any explanation as to why such feature would not be technically feasible. As is observed above, there is no direct and unambiguous support for Mr Kovacs' allegation in the patent in suit, even when the general common knowledge in this field is taken into consideration.

1.6 As a corollary to the above, the Board holds that the skilled person has no reason to interpret the wording of Claim 1 other than literally. Claim 1 therefore does not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC for the reasons given in points 1.1 and 1.2 above.

2. First auxiliary request

2.1 In Claim 1 of this request, the hot tack sealing feature discussed above is amended to read "to broaden the temperature range over which a hot tack strength is at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) is achieved, wherein the hot tack strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C". According to the Appellant, the basis for this feature could be found in the original description, page 2, lines 18 to 22; page 4, lines 17 to 19, Example 25 and Figures 7 and 8.

2.2 The Board notes that the description at page 2, lines 18 to 22 is not directed to any aspects of the alleged invention but to the hot tack seal initiation temperatures and sealing range of prior art polyethylene films. This information is therefore not suitable to support the Appellant's case.

At page 4, lines 17 to 19, it is mentioned that "a surprising feature of the pouch's film structure of the present invention is the film's broad heat sealing range. Generally, the heat sealing range of the film structure can be from 70°C to 140°C". Since "a heat sealing range" is not necessarily the range of temperatures over which the hot tack strength is measured, this passage cannot be considered as support for the feature "wherein the hot tack strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C".

Finally, in Example 25, the hot tack strength is measured over the temperature range of from 70°C to 130°C (see in particular page 24, line 35). There is no basis for the feature of conducting the measurements to an upper limit of 140°C. Nor can Figures 6 to 8 provide additional information since they are only graphic illustrations of some of the data obtained according to Example 25 (see page 26, lines 3 to 7). As a consequence, the amendment to Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request contravenes Article 123(2) EPC.

2.3 The Board, for the following reasons, does not concur with the Appellant that this amendment of Claim 1 should be accepted under Rule 88 EPC, as a correction to the wording of Claim 1 as granted.

2.3.1 Assuming that such a request for correction could be admitted at this stage - which is highly disputable - Rule 88 EPC provides that if such request concerns the description, claims or drawings, the correction must be obvious in the sense that it is immediately evident that nothing else must have been intended than what is offered as correction. Furthermore, in the decision G 3/89 (OJ EPO: 1993, 117), the Enlarged Board of Appeal specified that, for a correction under Rule 88, second sentence EPC, to be allowed, the respective part of the European patent must contain such an obvious error that a skilled person was in no doubt that the feature concerned cannot be meant to read as such. If, on the other hand, it was doubtful whether that feature was incorrectly defined, then a correction was ruled out (see point 5 of the decision).

2.3.2 In the present case, the wording in Claim 1 "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C, wherein the hot tack strength is at least 1.0 N/inch" is comprehensible in its literal sense and a different interpretation does not impose itself in view of the description and/or the common general knowledge (see points 1.2 to 1.6 above). Even if the Board considered an interpretation of granted Claim 1 in the broader context of the description, it was at least doubtful that the skilled person would come to the conclusion that the feature in question was incorrectly defined in that claim. Therefore, the precondition for correction under Rule 88, second sentence EPC is not met.

3. Second auxiliary request

Claim 1 of this request includes the feature "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C". It is therefore not allowable for the same reasons as for Claim 1 of the main request.

4. Third auxiliary request

The reasoning for Claim 1 of the first request applies mutatis mutandis to Claim 1 of this request which includes the feature "to broaden the temperature range over which a hot tack seal of a hot tack seal strength of at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) is achieved, wherein the hot tack seal strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 140°C".

5. Fourth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of this request includes the feature "to broaden the hot tack sealing range to a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 130°C". Thus, compared to the corresponding feature in Claim 1 of the main request, the upper limit of the heat sealing range is 130°C instead of 140°C. The reasoning for Claim 1 of the main request therefore applies mutatis mutandis to Claim 1 of this request since there is no basis in the application documents as filed for a hot tack sealing range of a ULDPE heat seal layer of from 70°C to 130°C.

6. Fifth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of this request is identical to Claim 1 of the third auxiliary request, with the only difference that "the hot tack strength is measured over a heat sealing range of from 70°C to 130°C".

6.1 It is common ground that the only disclosure in the description indicating hot tack strength measurements over the temperature range of from 70°C to 130°C is in Example 25. The question is therefore as to whether, based on this example alone, a generalisation can be made in the sense that the use of from 10 to 100 percent by weight of a ultra low density linear ethylene copolymer as defined in Claim 1 results in broadening the temperature range over which a hot tack strength of at least 1.0 N/inch (39.4 N/m) is achieved.

6.2 The Board accepts the Appellant's submission presented during the oral proceedings and understands the broadening of the hot tack sealing range as relative to a standard using a commercially available film such as the "SCLAIRFILM SM-3" mentioned in the description, at page 11, lines 19 to 23. This standard is tested as Comparative Sample 3 in Example 25. The test results for this standard and a number of samples according to the alleged invention are listed in Table VIII (page 25). These test data show that not all samples made with the use of an ULDPE as defined in Claim 1 have a hot tack seal range broader than that of the afore-mentioned standard. Indeed, for Sample 2A, made according to the alleged invention, this range is between 105°C to 120°C while it is between 104.5°C to 120°C for the Comparative Sample 3. This observation is in agreement with the Appellant's submission of 17 November 2000, which was confirmed at the oral proceedings before the Board. Example 25 thus cannot serve as a basis for the contention that, as a general rule, the hot tack sealing range is broader (relative to a standard) when an ULDPE as defined in Claim 1 is used in a heat seal layer of a film structure. As a consequence, the Board holds that the amended Claim 1 of this request lacks support in the application documents as originally filed, and thus contravenes Article 123(2) EPC.

6.3 The above conclusion is not invalidated by the Appellant's argument that Sample 2A was not an example according to the alleged invention because it did not exhibit the desired broadening of the hot tack sealing range (see also letter of 17 November 2000, page 12, last paragraph). The inappropriateness of this argument is apparent from the fact that the film structure of sample 2A is encompassed by the wording of Claim 1.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility