Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t060465eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0465/06 (surfactant and benefit stripes/UNILEVER) 24-05-2007
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0465/06 (surfactant and benefit stripes/UNILEVER) 24-05-2007

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T046506.20070524
Date of decision
24 May 2007
Case number
T 0465/06
Petition for review of
-
Application number
98901965.8
IPC class
A61K 7/50
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 31.7 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Cleansing composition with separately dispensed cleansing base and benefit base wherein benefit base also comprises surfactant

Applicant name
UNILEVER PLC, et al
Opponent name
HENKEL KGaA
Board
3.3.06
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords

Late request (admissible): minor amendments - no delay of the proceedings

Inventive step (main and auxiliary request): no - desired technical effect not achievable over the whole area of claim 1; obvious alternative

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0939/92
T 0694/92
T 0583/93
T 0668/94
Citing decisions
-

I. This appeal is from the Opposition Division's decision to revoke European patent No. 0 966 264.

Claim 1 of the patent as granted reads:

"1. An aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturising composition comprising:

(a) 10% to 99,9% by weight of the total product of a base formulation, the base formulation comprising: 1 to 35% by weight of an anionic, nonionic, amphoteric/zwitterionic or cationic surfactant or mixture thereof; and the balance water; and

(b) 0.1% to 90% by weight of the total product of an additive formulation, the additive formulation comprising:

(i) 5 to 80% by weight of a skin benefit agent;

(ii) 0.1% to 20% by weight of an anionic, amphoteric/zwitterionic or cationic surfactant or mixture thereof; and

(iii) the balance water;

wherein the additive formulation and the base formulation are physically separate but are combinably dispensed from a single packaging means as individual stripes thereby avoiding the need to post-mix the base formulation with the additive formulation prior to use;

wherein each stripe has a width of at least 1000 microns."

II. An opposition based on lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 100(a), 54 and 56 EPC) was filed against this decision.

The following document was filed, inter alia, with the notice of opposition:

(2) EP-B-0 755 243.

During the opposition proceedings the opponent (now the respondent) filed, inter alia, the following documents:

(10) Umbach: Kosmetik, Thieme Verlag, 1988,

pages 223-231 and

(12) "An Introduction to the Formulation of Shampoos,

Cosmetics and Toiletries", Vol.103, March 1988,

pages 25 to 58.

III. In its decision the Opposition Division held that the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the patent as granted did not involve an inventive step.

The patent proprietors (now appellants) filed an appeal against this decision and, under cover of the letter dated 7 April 2004 containing the statement of grounds of appeal, a main request and four auxiliary requests.

IV. At the beginning of the oral proceedings which took place on 24 May 2007, the appellants withdrew auxiliary requests 1 to 4 and submitted a new auxiliary request.

Claim 1 of the auxiliary request differs from Claim 1 as granted in that the passage

"(a) 10% to 99,9 % by weight" was replaced by

"(a) 30 to 70 wt.% by weight" and

"(b) 0.1% to 90% by weight" was replaced by

"(b) 70 - 30% by weight"

V. The appellants argued in writing and orally in essence as follows:

The difference between the patent in suit and document (2) as the closest prior art lied, in essence, in the absence of surfactants in the benefit additive formulation. The addition of a specified amount of surfactant to the benefit stripe in order to obtain an increased foaming volume would not be obvious since the skilled person would have had no incentive to add surfactants to the benefit stripe.

The Opposition Division was not right in assuming that it was known that oily benefit agents suppress foaming and that the benefit agent used according to the invention was of foam suppressing nature. Therefore, the Opposition Division's argument to add a surfactant in order to counteract against the foam suppressing nature was not acceptable.

The results in table III of the patent in suit would prove that there was an increase in foam levels.

The effect would also have been shown over the whole scope of the claims.

VI. The respondent's arguments can be summarized as follows:

It would have been known from document (2) to add the benefit agent in form of an emulsion comprising oil, a surfactant and water. The requirement of physical separation of base and additive formulation would also be met by the compositions according to document (2).

It would have been known that a combination of anionic and amphoteric surfactant agents would lead to synergistic effects and that nonionic surfactants foam less than anionic and amphoteric surfactants.

The comparative examples would provide inconsistent results. Moreover, they would not be appropriate for drawing any conclusions because of the following reasons:

(a) the effective concentration of the active surfactants in the base formulation would not be known,

(b) compositions known as foaming would be compared with compositions known as not foaming,

(c) different amphoteric surfactants were used in the benefit stripe and surfactant stripe, respectively.

VII. The appellants requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained as granted or alternatively on the basis of the auxiliary request submitted during oral proceedings.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.

1. Late request

The admissibility of the appellants' auxiliary request presented at the beginning of the oral proceedings was put in question by the respondent for being late.

The request however did not change the legal or factual framework of the case since the amendments introduced into Claim 1 of the auxiliary request were minor and clearly allowable (see herein below point 3.1). Also, the subject-matter claimed in the auxiliary request was manifestly known to the respondent so that it did not argue that it was taken by surprise or not reasonably prepared for discussing it. Hence, it was apparent that the admission of the late filed auxiliary request would not delay the proceedings.

For the above reasons, the Board admitted the auxiliary request into the appeal proceedings.

2. Main request

2.1 Inventive step

2.1.1 The patent in suit relates to detergent compositions suitable for topical applications for cleansing and improving the condition of the human body.

It acknowledges that it was already known to dispense the cleansing and moisturizing components separately but combinedly as discrete stripes (page 2, lines 5 to 8, 22 to 23). The benefit agent stripe of the separately dispensed, non-mixed prior to use, dual cleanser/moisturizer compositions of the present invention has, however, been modified so that it now includes surfactant (page 2, lines 29 to 31).

2.1.2 According to the patent in suit by this modification

1) the total lather can be enhanced,

2) the problems associated with inadvertent, uneven striping can be ameliorated and

3) control to the user can be added as to how much or little cleansers is dispensed (page 2, lines 41 to 45).

2.1.3 Prior art detergent compositions suitable for topical application for cleansing and moisturising the skin are disclosed in document (2). In these compositions the cleansing and moisturising benefit components are separate but combinedly dispensable from packaging means as discrete domains (page 1, lines 1 to 9, page 2, lines 1 to 6).

Exactly as in the patent in suit, the surface active agent of the compositions according to document (2) is selected from anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic and cationic surface active agents.

Therefore, this document is a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step.

2.1.4 The problem underlying the patent in suit has to be determined in the light of the teaching of document (2).

During the oral proceedings the appellants did not rely on the effects alleged in the patent in suit and recalled above under points 2.1.2 2) and 2.1.2 3), but only argued that the problem solved in the patent in suit was to obtain an increased foam volume over the prior art compositions wherein the benefit stripe did not contain surfactant agents (see point above 2.1.2, 1)).

2.1.5 The Board observes that the breadth of the claim has also to be taken into consideration. Therefore, the question has to be answered whether the alleged technical advantage is achievable over the whole area claimed (T 939/92, OJ EPO 1996, 309; T 694/92, OJ EPO 1997, 408; T 583/93, OJ EPO 1996, 496; T 668/94), in particular within the whole concentration ranges of the surface active agents in the base (i.e. 1 to 35 % by weight) and additive (i.e. 0.1 to 20% by weight) formulations.

2.1.6 Tables II and IV of the patent in suit display the foam volume (in ml) as a function of the combinations of different surfactant stripe concentrations with different benefit stripe concentrations.

The Board notes that each invention composition of experiments 6 in tables III and V, i.e. samples comprising 90% surfactant stripe and 10% benefit stripe, generates a foam volume which is lower than that of the corresponding comparative example wherein the benefit stripe does not contain surfactant agents, namely 88 vs. 89 ml and 152 vs. 172 ml, respectively. So, the performance of the compositions according to the invention examples 6 of tables III and V is worse than that of the corresponding comparative examples 6. Hence the technical problem identified by the appellants is manifestly not solved within the whole range of 10 to 99,9% by weight of surfactant stripe (base formulation) and 0,1 to 90% by weight of benefit stripe (additive formulation).

2.1.7 The consequence is that the property of obtaining high foam volumes is to be disregarded in the determination of the objective problem underlying the patent in suit, and, thus, in the assessment of inventive step.

2.1.8 For the above reasons, and since the Board considers the other technical effects alleged in the patent in suit (see above points 2.1.2. 2) and 2.1.2 3)) manifestly lacking credibility, the sole objective problem underlying the patent in suit can be seen in providing further aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturising compositions.

The patent in suit proposes as the solution to this problem the aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturising compositions according to Claim 1 of the patent in suit.

2.1.9 It remains to be decided whether or not the proposed solution to the problem underlying the patent in suit is obvious in view of the state of the art.

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent in suit differs from that of document (2) only for the additional presence of surfactant agents in the benefit stripe.

In particular, the question is therefore whether the addition of surfactants to the benefit agent according to document (2) involves an inventive step.

2.1.10 According to the appellants the addition of a surfactant to the benefit stripe (additive formulation) would not be obvious.

2.1.11 The Board cannot agree. Document (2) disclosed a benefit agent which may be provided in the form of an emulsion (page 5, line 16), which may comprise surfactant active agents, water and oil.

Further document (2) disclosed a base formulation comprising sodium cocoyl isethionate (7.5 wt.-%) i.e. an anionic surfactant agent, cocoamidopropyl betaine (3.75 wt.-%) i.e. an amphoteric surfactant and stearic acid and behenyl alcohol both defined as benefit agents (page 15, lines 1 to 10, page 3, line 17 and page 4, lines 3 and 7). The fact that this formulation was called a base formulation in document (2) is not relevant. What is of importance is that document (2) teaches the addition of surfactants to a benefit agent.

Hence, for a skilled person, the possibility of adding the active agent to a benefit agent was known from document (2) and, therefore, in the patent in suit this measure cannot contribute an inventive step.

2.1.12 It follows that the subject-matter of Claim 1 does not involve an inventive step, and therefore, does not meet the requirements of Article 56 EPC.

Consequently, the main request is not allowable.

3. Auxiliary request

3.1 Claim 1

Claim 1 of the auxiliary request differs from Claim 1 as granted in that the passage

"(a) 10% to 99,9 % by weight" was replaced by

"(a) 30 to 70 wt.% by weight" and

"(b) 0.1% to 90% by weight" was replaced by

"(b) 70 - 30% by weight"

The Board is satisfied that these amendments meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, since the amendments find their support in claims 2 and 4 of the application as filed.

3.2 Inventive step

3.2.1 The reasoning set out under points 2.1.1 to 2.1.6 applies mutatis mutandis to the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the auxiliary request. In particular, the appellants however still argued that, in the light of document (2) as closest state of the art, the problem underlying the patent was to obtain an increased foam volume over the prior art compositions wherein the benefit compositions did not contain surfactant agents.

However, a narrower range than in Claim 1 of the main request is now at stake in Claim 1 of the auxiliary request, namely 30 to 70% surfactant stripe and 70 to 30% benefit stripe.

Hence, the Board has to examine whether there is sufficient evidence that this technical problem was at least solved within this narrower range. Therefore, it focuses on the experiments 3, 4 and 5 (hereinafter called examples 3, 4 and 5 and comparative examples 3, 4 and 5) in rows 3 to 5 of table III and table V which are representative of the range of 30 to 70% surfactant stripe and 70 to 30% benefit stripe.

3.2.2 The Board concurs with the appellants that the problem of obtaining a high foam volume has been plausibly solved by the experiments of tables III and V.

Nevertheless the Board has to point to the concentrations of the anionic, nonionic and amphoteric surfactants involved in solving the above mentioned technical problem of high foaming. All the compositions according to the examples 3, 4 and 5 comprised anionic, nonionic and amphoteric surfactants in the specific concentrations indicated in tables I, II and IV.

3.2.3 However the Board notes that according to Claim 1 of the auxiliary request the base formulation still comprises 1 to 35 wt% of an anionic, nonionic, amphoteric/zwitterionic or cationic surfactant and the additive formulation 0.1 to 20% by weight of anionic, amphoteric, zwitterionic or cationic surfactant.

Therefore, according to Claim 1 the simultaneous presence of anionic, nonionic, amphoteric or cationic surface active agents in the base formulation and anionic, amphoteric or cationic surface active agents in the additive formulation is not compulsory. So, the base formulation may comprise, for instance, only 1% by weight of an amphoteric surfactant and the additive formulation 0.1% by weight of an amphoteric surfactant without any other type of surfactant being present.

However, this combination would reasonably lead to a low foam volume since amphoteric surfactants are insignificant if used alone, what is common general knowledge (see document (10), page 228, bottom of the page).

Also the combination of 1% by weight of a nonionic surfactant in the base formulation and 0,1% by weight of a cationic surfactant in the additive formulation would reasonably not lead to the desired result since it was known that nonionic surfactants are poor foaming agents (see document (12), page 8, left column, line 1).

It follows that the desired technical effect cannot reasonably be expected to be achieved when considering the whole subject-matter of the auxiliary request relating to compositions having 30 to 70 wt%.-% of surfactant stripe and 70 to 30 wt.-% of benefit stripe.

The consequence is that the property of obtaining high foam volumes is also to be disregarded in the determination of the objective problem underlying the invention as claimed in the auxiliary request and, thus, in the assessment of inventive step.

3.2.4 Hence, also for the present request, the sole problem credibly solved is that of providing further aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturising compositions.

The proposed solution to this problem is the aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturising compositions according to Claim 1 of the auxiliary request.

3.2.5 It remains to be decided whether or not this is obvious in view of the state of the art.

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent in suit differs from that of document (2) only for the additional presence of surfactant agents in the benefit stripe.

In particular, the question is therefore whether the addition of surfactants to the benefit agent according to document (2) involves an inventive step.

The reasoning continues in the same way as under points 2.1.11 to 2.1.12. In summary, document (2) already teaches the possibility of adding surfactants to the benefit agent.

Hence, for a skilled person looking for further aqueous liquid cleansing and moisturizing compositions this measure cannot contribute an inventive step.

3.2.6 It follows that the subject-matter of Claim 1 does not involve an inventive step, and therefore, does not meet the requirements of Article 56 EPC.

The auxiliary request is not allowable.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility