European Patent Office

T 0128/10 of 10.12.2010

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T012810.20101210
Date of decision
10 December 2010
Case number
T 0128/10
Petition for review of
-
Application number
96114753.5
IPC class
G06K 7/06
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
IC card reader with audio output
Applicant name
Gemalto SA
Opponent name
Molnia, David
Board
3.4.01
Headnote

I. According to Rule 22 EPC in conjunction with Rule 85 EPC, the procedural requirements to be fulfilled for recording the transfer of a European patent in the European Patent Register consist in the filing of a request of the interested party, the production of documents providing evidence of the transfer, and the payment of an administrative fee. These requirements do not need to be fulfilled at the same time. If they are met on different dates, the transfer shall only have effect vis-à-vis the EPO at the date on which all the requirements mentioned above are fulfilled (Reasons, 3.5).

II. If an appellant declares that it was its true intention to file an appeal on behalf of its name, there is no deficiency in the notice of appeal concerning the name of the appellant which may be remedied in accordance with Rule 99(1)(a) EPC in conjunction with Rule 101(2) EPC (in agreement with T 97/98) nor an error which may be corrected pursuant to Rule 139, first sentence, EPC (Reasons, 5.4).

Keywords
-
Catchword
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible