Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0974/10 05-07-2011
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0974/10 05-07-2011

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T097410.20110705
Date of decision
05 July 2011
Case number
T 0974/10
Petition for review of
-
Application number
02741016.6
IPC class
B29B 7/88
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 43.49 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Process and apparatus for the production of filled thermoplastic polymers

Applicant name
Magma S.p.A.
Opponent name
EREMA Engineering Recycling Maschinen und Anlagen Gesellschaft m.b.H
Board
3.2.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 84
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
Keywords

Clarity - no (main request and first auxiliary request)

Inventive step - yes (second auxiliary request)

Sole appellant put in a worse position - no

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0009/92
G 0001/99
Citing decisions
T 0648/15

I. The appellant (opponent) lodged an appeal against the interlocutory decision of the Opposition Division posted on 9 March 2010 maintaining European patent No. 1 401 623 in amended form.

The Opposition Division held that the grounds of opposition under Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty, Article 54 EPC, and lack of inventive step, Article 56 EPC) and Article 100(c) EPC (inadmissible extension, Article 123(2) EPC) did not prejudice the maintenance of the patent in amended form on the basis of the amended claims 1 to 8 filed as a second auxiliary request on 16 November 2009.

II. Oral proceedings were held before the Board of Appeal on 5 July 2011.

III. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent in suit be revoked.

The respondent (patent proprietor) requested, as its main request, that the appeal be dismissed, or, as an auxiliary measure, that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent in suit be maintained on the basis of any one of the sets of claims filed as first, second and third auxiliary requests, with the second auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings and the first and third auxiliary requests filed on 6 June 2011.

IV. Claims 1 and 5 as maintained (main request) read as follows:

"1. A process of producing thermoplastic material containing a filler comprising the steps of:

feeding a base thermoplastic material to a container (1) provided with mixing and stirring means (2, 3) comprising a disintegrating means (3, 3a);

increasing the temperature of the base thermoplastic material until said material has reached a softened condition by means of said stirring and disintegrating means (3, 3a);

feeding a filler to said thermoplastic material in the lower portion of said container (1), where the thermoplastic material is in a softened condition, by means of a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1);

mixing said filler with said softened thermoplastic material within said container (1);

collecting said material filled with said filler from said container and carrying out a densification step of said softened and filled material."

"5. An apparatus for producing filled thermoplastic material comprising: a container (1) having mixing and stirring means (2) comprising a disintegrating means (3, 3a) for bringing said thermoplastic polymeric material to a softened condition and means (7, 10) for feeding a filler to said thermoplastic polymeric within said container; said feeding means comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1) and being located in the lower portion of the container, where the thermoplastic material is in a softened condition; means (5) for collecting the softened and filled material from said container and means (5-6) for subjecting said filled material to at least one densification step."

Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request is identical to claim 1 of the main request.

Claim 5 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 5 of the main request in that the wording "[said feeding means] comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1) and being located in the lower portion of the container" has been replaced by the wording "[said feeding means] being located at the lower portion of the container, where the thermoplastic material is in a softened condition and comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1)".

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the wording "by means of a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1)" has been replaced by the wording "by feeding means (4), said feeding means comprising a screw (10) fixed to said container (1), said screw including a cylinder and having an outlet (12) in said lower portion of the container (1), and further comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said screw (10) and said container".

Claim 5 of the second auxiliary request differs from claim 5 of the main request in that the wording "[said feeding means] comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1) and being located in the lower portion of the container" has been replaced by the wording "[said feeding means] comprising a screw (10) fixed to said container (1), said screw including a cylinder and having an outlet (12) located in said lower portion of the container (1) where the thermoplastic material is in a softened condition, and comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said screw (10) and said container".

V. The documents referred to in the appeal proceedings included the following:

D13 Documents D13a to D13l relating to a prior use by the appellant of the Recyling Installation RGA 160 T + 5D for producing filled thermoplastic material, handed over to, and accepted by, Plasticos Alica, S.A. de C.V., on 1 June 1998.

D35 Dosieren im modernen Produktionsprozess, brochure of the firm K-Tron Soder entitled "K-Tron Soder Road Show", issue 4/95, cover page and pages 2 and 11.

D36 DE-U 88 07 569.9

D41 Schüttguttechnik in der Kunststoffindustrie, VDI-Gesellschaft Kunststofftechnik, VDI-Verlag GmbH Düsseldorf 1998, front and back cover, two title pages, and pages 154 and 155.

D42 Der Doppelschneckenextruder, VDI-Gesellschaft Kunststofftechnik, VDI-Verlag GmbH Düsseldorf 1995, front and back cover, two title pages, and pages 216 and 217.

VI. The arguments of the appellant, in writing and during the oral proceedings, can be summarized as follows:

Objection of lack of clarity (claim 5 as maintained and claim 5 of the first auxiliary request)

Claim 5 as maintained specified that the feeding means, including the gravimetric metering device, was located in the lower portion of the container. However, there was no disclosure in the patent in suit that all parts of the feeding means were located in the container. This objection also applied to claim 5 of the first auxiliary request. Both claims therefore lacked clarity.

Admissibility of the amendments (claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request)

Claim 5 of second auxiliary request no longer contained the feature that the gravimetric metering device was located in the lower portion of the container. This was in breach of the principle of reformatio in peius.

The transfer of the filler from the metering device to the screw in claim 1 of the second auxiliary request was not clear, contrary to Article 84 EPC.

The amendments now present in claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request were based on the best mode embodiment described in the patent in suit. Both claims failed to include the feature that the gravimetric metering device had a hopper and a screw 11a and the feature that the screw 10 had an uncovered opening located below said hopper (cf in particular paragraph [0034] and Figure 3, of the patent in suit), contrary to Article 123(2) EPC.

Objection of lack of inventive step, Article 56 EPC

Document D13 related to the prior use of a recycling installation for producing filled thermoplastic material. This document represented the closest state of the art. The subject-matter of claim 5 of the second auxiliary request differed from the apparatus known from document D13 in that a gravimetric metering device rather than a volumetric metering device was used, and that that gravimetric metering device was physically detached from the container. Since gravimetric metering devices were more accurate than volumetric metering devices, it was obvious to the person skilled in the art to replace the volumetric metering device of the known recycling installation by a gravimetric metering device. Document D35 described a gravimetric metering device and taught that it was of the utmost importance to isolate the gravimetric metering device from its surroundings without any friction. Document D41 taught that a gravimetric metering device must be free standing and that influences from the surroundings, such as vibrations, had to be avoided. Document D42 showed a gravimetric metering device feeding a filler to an outlet screw, from where the filler fell into a hopper positioned under and adjacent to that screw, said hopper being connected to a second screw which was in turn connected to the inlet of an extruder. The gravimetric metering device was thus physically detached from the extruder. It followed that the person skilled in the art starting from document D13, in view of the disclosure of documents D35, D41 and D42, would have arrived at the subject-matter of claim 5 of the second auxiliary request without exercising inventive skill. This applied likewise to the process claim 1 of said request.

VII. The respondent's arguments, in writing and during the oral proceedings, can be summarized as follows:

Objection of lack of clarity (claim 5 as maintained and claim 5 of the first auxiliary request)

The feature "said feeding means comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1) and being located in the lower portion of the container" in claim 5 as maintained was clear. It consisted of two sentences, viz "comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1)" and "being located in the lower portion of the container". The latter sentence could not refer to the metering device, since otherwise the word "being" should have been deleted. The meaning of the word "in" in the wording "feeding means ... being located in the lower portion of the container" was not "inside or within", but rather indicated that the lower portion was the area where the feeding means were connected to the container.

In claim 5 of the first auxiliary request the order of the sentences referred to above was rearranged with a view to overcoming the clarity objection raised by the Board against claim 5 as maintained, and the expression "located in" was clarified to read "located at", as in claim 9 as granted. Claim 5 of the first auxiliary request, which corresponded to claim 9 as granted, was therefore clear.

Admissibility of the amendments (claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request)

Claim 5 of second auxiliary request was narrower in scope than claim 5 as maintained and was not to the appellant's disadvantage. The prohibition of reformatio in peius was respected.

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request was clear; there was no need to specify in more detail than given in column 5, lines 48 to 50, of the patent in suit, how the metering device fed the filler to the screw.

Likewise, there was no need to introduce the feature that the metering device comprised a hopper into the independent claims in order to meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, since it was generally disclosed that the metering device fed the filler to the screw without a hopper (see page 8, lines 16 and 17, of the application as filed (published version); see also Figure 1, which did not show a hopper). The feature that the gravimetric metering device 7 was physically detached from the container was disclosed in claim 8 as filed, since the terms "separate" and "detached" were synonymous. This also followed from the passage on page 8, lines 18 to 29, of the application as filed (published version).

The second auxiliary request was thus formally admissible.

Objection of lack of inventive step, Article 56 EPC

The prior use described in document D13 represented the closest state of the art. In the apparatus according to the prior use by the appellant a volumetric metering device was used, which was connected to a feed opening in the wall of the container and was also connected to the container through a bracket. All other counts of prior use by the appellant also concerned apparatuses having volumetric metering devices. For this reason alone it was not obvious to replace the volumetric metering device by a gravimetric metering device. None of the prior art documents taught the use of a gravimetric metering that was completely physically detached from the container. Document D35 taught using a flexible bellow. Document D36 indicated that there was a problem with using a flexible bellow for connecting a gravimetric metering device to an extruder: if the bellow was too rigid, the discharge was not accurate, and if it was too flexible, there was a dusting problem. The person skilled in the art would not refrain from using a bellow since to do so would make the dusting problem worse. The arrows in Figure 7.6 of document D42 represented physical connections. Consequently, the subject-matter of claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request involved an inventive step.

Main request and first auxiliary request

1. Allowability of the amendments, Article 84 EPC

1.1 Claim 5 as maintained includes the feature (henceforth referred to as feature (f)):

(f) said feeding means comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1) and being located in the lower portion of the container (emphasis added by the Board)

This feature has been amended vis-à-vis claim 6 as granted by the addition of the underlined text.

Whereas the former feature of claim 6 as granted, viz "said feeding means being located in the lower portion of the container", is clear by itself, and can be readily understood with reference to Figures 1, 3 and 4 and paragraphs [0033] to [0035] of the patent in suit to mean that the feeding means located in the lower portion of the container is in fact the outlet 12 and (part of) the screw 10, this cannot be said of feature (f) of claim 5 as maintained.

The respondent attempted to construe the wording of claim 5 as maintained to mean that the gravimetric metering device 7 was physically detached from the container, and located at or near the lower portion of the container.

However, it is intrinsically unclear how feeding means comprising a metering device can be "located in the lower portion of the container" whilst that metering device is "physically detached" from said container. Moreover, there is no support, either in the patent in suit or in the application as filed, that the gravimetric metering device 7 is located in, at or near the lower portion of the container. It is thus unclear whether claim 5 of the first auxiliary request requires the gravimetric metering device 7 to be located in or at the lower portion of the container.

1.2 In claim 5 of the first auxiliary request, feature (f) has been reworded as follows:

(f1) said feeding means being located at the lower portion of the container, ... and comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1)

In the judgment of the Board, the new wording does not solve the intrinsic lack of clarity of the claim for the same reasons as for claim 5 as maintained.

Consequently, claim 5 of the first auxiliary request does not meet the requirements of Article 84 EPC either.

1.3 The respondent has argued that claim 5 of the first auxiliary request corresponded to granted claim 9, ie a combination of granted claims 6, 7, 8 and 9. Since lack of clarity, Article 84 EPC, was not a ground for opposition, no objections under this article could be raised against a granted claim.

Whilst the Board concurs with the observation of the respondent that granted claims enjoy immunity with respect to clarity objections, the Board cannot accept that claim 5 of the first auxiliary request is identical to a combination of claims 6, 7, 8 and 9 as granted.

For example, the expression "said feeding means being located in the lower portion of the container" present in claim 6 as granted is no longer present in claim 5 of the first auxiliary request. It seems that said feature of claim 6 as granted and the feature of claim 9 as granted, viz said means for filler feeding (10) are located at the portion of said container (1) where the stirred material is in o (sic) softened state, have been merged into a new feature "said feeding means being located at the lower portion of the container". The word "separate from" in claim 8 as granted has been replaced by the expression "physically detached from". The feature of claim 7 as granted, viz wherein said container comprises means for disintegration (3, 3a) of said termoplastic (sic) material, has been combined with the wording of claim 6 as granted, viz a container (1) having mixing and stirring means (2), to read "a container (1) having mixing and stirring means (2) comprising a disintegrating means (3, 3a)", in other words, the mixing and stirring means (2) comprise a disintegrating means (3, 3a) (cf claim 2 as granted). Apart from the fact that replacing the word "in" in claim 6 as granted by the word "at" would seem to contravene the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC, it cannot fairly be said that claim 5 of the first auxiliary request is identical to a combination of claims 6, 7, 8 and 9 as granted.

Second auxiliary request

2. Prohibition of reformatio in peius

2.1 In a case where the opponent is the sole appellant against an interlocutory decision maintaining a patent in amended form, the patent proprietor is primarily restricted during the appeal proceedings to defending the patent in the form in which it was maintained by the Opposition Division in its interlocutory decision, see the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal G 9/92 (Non-appealing party / BMW, OJ EPO 1994, 875), point 2 of the Order, first sentence. The defence may include proposing amendments to the claims if they are appropriate and necessary.

The prohibition of reformatio in peius is the principle that, if defending the patent in the form in which it was maintained is not possible, the respondent (patent proprietor) should not be allowed to pursue claims which, if held allowable, would put the appellant in a worse situation than if it had not appealed.

In decision G 1/99 (Reformatio in peius / 3M, OJ EPO 2001, 381) the Enlarged Board of Appeal allowed an exception to this principle (see Order): However, an exception to this principle may be made in order to meet an objection put forward by the opponent/appellant or the Board during the appeal proceedings, in circumstances where the patent as maintained in amended form would otherwise have to be revoked as a direct consequence of an inadmissible amendment held allowable by the Opposition Division in its interlocutory decision. The Enlarged Board of Appeal laid down a strict order of possible amendments that a patent proprietor was allowed to file in order to overcome the deficiency.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal also stated (see decision G 1/99, loc. cit., Reasons point 12, last sentence): "However, in particular if the patent cannot be maintained for reasons which were not raised at the first instance, the non-appealing proprietor deserves protection for reasons of equity" (emphasis added).

In the present case the clarity objection (see point 1 above) was raised by the Board for the first time in appeal. The respondent must therefore be allowed to file amendments as foreseen in decision G 1/99 (loc. cit.), which decision gives due regard to the principle of equity (see also point 13 and point 14, last sentence, of the Reasons).

2.2 The first question to address is whether claim 5 of the second auxiliary request would put the appellant in a worse situation than if it had not appealed. Only if it does is the procedure laid down in G 1/99 to be applied.

The contested feature (f) in claim 5 as maintained has been reformulated as:

(f2) said feeding means comprising a screw (10) fixed to said container (1), said screw including a cylinder and having an outlet (12) located in said lower portion of the container (1) where the thermoplastic material is in a softened condition, and comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said screw (10) and said container

Claim 5 of the second auxiliary request still includes all the sub-features of feature (f): "said feeding means [being] located in the lower portion of the container" and "said feeding means comprising a gravimetric metering device (7) physically detached from said container (1)", although linguistically arranged in a different order.

2.3 The appellant argued that claim 5 as maintained required the gravimetric metering device 7 to be located in the lower portion of the container. Since claim 5 of the second auxiliary request no longer required this to be the case, the consequence was reformatio in peius.

In the judgment of the Board, the appellant's interpretation of claim 5 as maintained does not follow unambiguously from the wording of said (unclear) claim, nor is it supported by the description of the patent in suit.

Furthermore, the Opposition Division never intended to maintain claim 5 in a form in which the apparatus comprises a gravimetric metering device 7 located in the lower portion of the container. The whole thrust of the interpretation of claim 5 as maintained in the decision under appeal is that the gravimetric metering device 7 is physically detached from the container, see eg point 5.2 of the Reasons.

2.4 It follows that the second auxiliary request, if held allowable, does not put the appellant in a worse situation than if it had not appealed.

3. Admissibility of the amendments, Articles 84 and 123(2) EPC

3.1 The appellant submitted that claim 1 of the second auxiliary request was not clear, since the claim was silent on the manner in which the filler was fed from the gravimetric metering device to the screw.

The last sentence of paragraph [0033] of the patent in suit, which has been cited in point 1.1 above, reads: "The metering device 7 feeds the filler to a screw 10 that has its outlet in the container 1." In the judgment of the Board there is no need to provide more detail than already present in claim 1 of the second auxiliary request about how the filler is fed from the metering device to the feed screw.

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request therefore meets the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

In the judgment of the Board, claim 5 of the second auxiliary request is also clear. Since this has not been contested by the appellant, there is no need for further substantiation.

3.2 The appellant has submitted that the additional features "a screw (10) fixed to said container (1)" and "said screw including a cylinder and having an outlet (12) (located) in said lower portion of the container" in claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request were taken from the section "Best mode for carrying out the invention" of the application as filed (published version), see page 5, lines 26 ff, and Figure 3. Since not all of the features of the best mode embodiment were included in claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request (eg the inverted hopper 11 shown in Figure 3) said claims represented an intermediate generalization of the disclosure as filed, and as such contravened the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC. Moreover, there was no disclosure that the gravimetric metering device was physically detached from the container (the device was only physically detached from the screw; claim 8 as filed was not an appropriate basis for this feature, since the different wording "separate from" was used).

In the judgment of the Board, the description of Figure 3 (see page 8, lines 18 to 24) contains the general teaching that "device 7 is physically detached from the cylinder of screw 10".

According to claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request, the screw 10 is fixed to the container 1 (see page 8, line 29, of the application as filed (published version)) and the gravimetric metering device 7 is physically detached from the screw 10 (see page 8, lines 23 and 24, page 9, line 2, and page 10, lines 15 and 16 of the application as filed (published version)). In the judgment of the Board, these two statements imply that the gravimetric metering device 7 must be physically detached from the container (see also claim 8 as filed, wherein the expression "separate from" is used, which is synonymous with the expression "physically detached from").

Claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request therefore meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.

4. Objection of lack of inventive step, Article 56 EPC

4.1 Document D13 represents the closest state of the art. The prior use apparatus, ie the recycling installation RGA 160 T + 5D, known from document D13 comprises a volumetric powder doser (see item 11 on page 12 of document D13a) of the firm K-Tron (see document D13d). According to the statements of the witness Mr Michael Pöllhuber, who was heard during the oral proceedings before the Opposition Division, the powder doser was fixed to the container ("Schneidverdichter") via a bracket and mechanically connected to an opening in the wall of the container (see Annex 1 to the minutes, page 18, lines 7 to 22).

The subject-matter of claim 5 of the second auxiliary request differs from the apparatus for producing filled thermoplastic material known from document D13 mainly in:

(i) said feeding means ... comprising a gravimetric metering device (7)

(ii) said gravimetric metering device (7) being physically detached from said screw (10) and said container.

Whilst volumetric metering devices and gravimetric metering devices, which discharge a particular volume of material and a particular volume of material per unit time, respectively, are both well known in the art, and assuming that it is a simple matter of choice whether to opt for one or the other, this is not to say that starting from document D13 it was obvious to the person skilled in the art to replace the volumetric powder doser of the recycling installation known from said document by a gravimetric metering device without taking additional measures. The person skilled in the art would not consider mounting a gravimetric metering device onto a bracket fixed to the container (as the existing volumetric metering device was mounted) since the container has mixing, stirring and disintegrating means that could vibrate during operation.

Assuming for the sake of argument that the person skilled in the art would consider using a gravimetric metering device rather than a volumetric metering one in the recycling installation known from document D13, he or she might seek to avoid the device being exposed to vibrations and try to isolate it from its surroundings (see page 11, section 4.5, lines 2 to 4, of document D35), for example by mounting the device on a bracket of its own.

Mounting the metering device on a dedicated structure, ie on a structure that is different from the structure of the container or any structure connected thereto, is necessary to ensure that the metering device is detached or separated from the container. However, it is not sufficient to ensure that the metering device is physically detached from the container and screw in the sense of the invention. The expression "physically detached" in feature (ii) must be interpreted narrowly in the sense that there is no physical contact at all between the metering device and the screw fixed to the container.

In the judgment of the Board, the use of a contactless gravimetric metering device is the essence of the invention claimed in claims 1 and 5 of the second auxiliary request, see column 6, lines 7 to 13, of the patent in suit, which reads: The use of a "suspended" gravimetric metering device ... comprising metering means detached from the screw ..., makes it possible to obtain an extremely high constancy and uniformity in the percentage of filler in the final material."

The use of a contactless gravimetric metering device in a process and apparatus for producing thermoplastic material containing a filler is not known from, or suggested by, the prior art.

In document D35 (see page 11, section 4.5, lines 5 and 6) it is stated that the silicon bellows developed by K-Tron are suitable for connecting the feeding device.

Whilst in document D36 the use of a flexible bellow seal ("Faltenbalg") connecting the outlet of a gravimetric metering device to the inlet of the extruder is identified as a source of error in determining the discharge (weight of material per unit time) (see page 4, lines 9 to 12), the solution to this problem is a different one, ie the decoupling of the flow of mass in the device 4 and the flow of mass to the inlet 5 of screw 9 (see the paragraph bridging pages 6 and 7). However, the gravimetric metering device described in document D36 is mounted onto a bracket, which is connected to the inlet 5 (see page 6, lines 20 to 24) and a sealing 16 is provided between the lower edge of the outlet of the metering device and the inlet 5 (see page 7, lines 7 to 14).

Document D41 teaches that vibrations should be reduced to a minimum (see page 154, last line) without indicating a solution, however. Whilst it is noted that a defective connection of the inlet and outlet pipes of the metering device may disturb the measurement ("Störgrößen: Fehlerhafte Anbindungen der Befüll- und Falleitung", see page 154, line 15) there is no teaching that the gravimetric metering device should be physically detached from the processing equipment.

Finally, in Figure 7.6 of document D42 (see page 217) a twin-screw extruder is shown comprising a gravimetric metering device 4 that seems to comprise an outlet screw for feeding a filler to a next station, which seems to comprise an inlet screw. There is no disclosure that the filler is fed from the outlet screw to the inlet screw without any a seal, bellow or covering between these screws, or more generally, there is no disclosure that the filler is fed from the metering device 4 to the next station without any physical contact between them.

4.2 The subject-matter of apparatus claim 5 of the second auxiliary request is therefore not obvious to the person skilled in the art, and hence involves an inventive step, Article 56 EPC.

The subject-matter of claims 6 to 8, which are dependent on claim 5, similarly involves an inventive step.

This also holds for the subject-matter of process claim 1 of the second auxiliary request and for the subject-matter of claims 2 to 4, which are dependent on claim 1.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent on the basis of the following documents:

Claims, No.:

1 to 8 filed as the second auxiliary request during the oral proceedings;

Description, pages:

2 to 5 filed during the oral proceedings; and

Drawings, pages:

8 and 9 as granted.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility