Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t110425eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0425/11 31-10-2014
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0425/11 31-10-2014

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T042511.20141031
Date of decision
31 October 2014
Case number
T 0425/11
Petition for review of
-
Application number
01906691.9
IPC class
B05B 13/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 394.87 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

SPRAY NOZZLE WITH IMPROVED ASYMMETRICAL FLUID DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTION

Applicant name
SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO.
Opponent name
Lechler GmbH
Board
3.2.07
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 84
European Patent Convention Art 56
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Keywords

Claims - clarity - main request (no)

Late-filed auxiliary request 5 amended - request clearly allowable (no)

Inventive step - auxiliary request 10 (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0001/99
Citing decisions
-

I. The appellant (opponent) lodged an appeal against the decision of the opposition division to maintain the European patent No. 1 251 968 in amended form, requesting that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked.

The opposition was filed against the patent as a whole and was based on Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step).

II. The respondent (patent proprietor) replied to the appeal with its letter dated 31 August 2011 requesting to dismiss the appeal or, in case the decision is set aside, to maintain the patent on the basis of one of the auxiliary requests 1 to 4.

As subsidiarily requested by both parties, oral proceedings were arranged. In the annex to the summons for oral proceedings, the Board provided the parties with its preliminary non-binding opinion that the respondent's requests were regarded as not fulfilling the requirements of Articles 84, 83, 123(2), 54(1) and/or 56 EPC.

In reaction the respondent filed with its letter dated 30 September 2014 additional auxiliary requests 5 to 10.

III. Oral proceedings took place on 31 October 2014 during which the following, inter alia, was discussed:

Claims 1 and 10 of the main request were discussed in the light of the requirements of Article 84 EPC in respect of "the plane of the [second/first] opening extends...", the Chairman having indicated that the clarity issue arising from the inserted term appeared to be pervading also the corresponding claims of auxiliary requests 1 to 9.

After the Board had announced their conclusion that claims 1 and 10 of the main request did not appear to be fulfilling the requirements of Article 84 EPC in respect of this feature, the issue of the angles lambda and delta being defined as "acute" in claims 1 and 10 of auxiliary request 5 was also discussed in respect of the requirements of Article 84 EPC. Following the announcement of the Board's conclusion that the inclusion of this characterisation would satisfy the requirements of Articles 83, 84 and 123(2) EPC, a break was allowed for the respondent to consider possible amendments to claims 1 and 10.

Auxiliary request 5 amended was filed in replacement of auxiliary request 5, which was withdrawn. This request was found not admissible in accordance with Article 13(1) RPBA as the amendments were not found to overcome the aforementioned objection of lack of clarity with respect to the planes of the openings.

Auxiliary request 10 was then discussed, first in light of the prohibition of reformatio in peius and the exceptions thereto as established in decision G 1/99 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, and then in respect of the requirements of Article 56 EPC in the light of the teachings of document D10 and common general knowledge or combined with the teachings of documents D7 or D9.

IV. At the end of the oral proceedings the appellant reiterated the request that the decision under appeal be set aside and the European patent No. 1 251 968 be revoked.

V. The respondent requested that the decision under appeal be upheld (main request). Subsidiarily, that the patent be maintained in accordance with one of auxiliary request 5 amended, filed during the oral proceedings, or auxiliary request 10, filed with the submissions dated 30 September 2014. Auxiliary requests 1 to 9 were withdrawn.

VI. The present decision was announced at the end of the oral proceedings.

VII. The wording of claim 1 of the main request reads as follows (amendments as compared to the independent claim 1 of the patent as granted are in bold with deletions in strike-through; emphasis added by the Board):

"A spray nozzle (10) for producing an asymmetrically distributed fluid discharge pattern (24) wherein the location of the maximum fluid discharge is offset from the center of the fluid discharge pattern, the spray nozzle (10) comprising:

a body portion having an internal fluid passageway which terminates in a substantially hemispherical dome shaped end wall (42), the fluid passageway having a longitudinal axis (48), and

a discharge orifice (36) provided in the end wall (42), said discharge orifice (36) being formed by two superimposed openings including a first relatively rounder opening and a second relatively more elongated opening which extends beyond the perimeter of the first opening [deleted: characterised by] said first and second openings extending at different angles relative to the longitudinal axis (48) of the fluid passageway such that the fluid discharge pattern thereby produced by the discharge orifice (36) has a continuous non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern

characterized in that the plane of said second opening extends at an anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and the plane of the first opening extends in the same direction at an anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane such that the angle lambda of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of the first opening."

The wording of claim 1 of the auxiliary request 5 amended reads as follows (amendments as compared to the independent claim 1 of the main request are in bold with deletions in strike-through; emphasis added by the Board):

"A spray nozzle (10) for producing an asymmetrically distributed fluid discharge pattern (24) wherein the location of the maximum fluid discharge is offset from the center of the fluid discharge pattern, the spray nozzle (10) comprising:

a body portion having an internal fluid passageway which terminates in a substantially hemispherical dome shaped end wall (42), the fluid passageway having a longitudinal axis (48), and

a discharge orifice (36) provided in the end wall (42), said discharge orifice (36) being formed by two superimposed openings including a first relatively rounder opening and a second relatively more elongated opening which extends beyond the perimeter of the first opening said first and second openings extending at different angles relative to the longitudinal axis (48) of the fluid passageway such that the fluid discharge pattern thereby produced by the discharge orifice (36) has a continuous non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern

characterized in that the [deleted: plane of said][deleted: ]second opening [deleted: extends ]is formed in a plane at an acute anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and [deleted: the plane of ]the first opening [deleted: extends ]is formed in a plane in the same direction at an acute anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane such that the angle lambda of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of the first opening."

The wording of claim 1 of the auxiliary request 10 reads as follows (amendments as compared to the independent claim 11 of the patent as granted are in bold with deletions in strike-through; emphasis added by the Board):

"A process for producing a spray nozzle (10) which has an asymmetrically distributed fluid discharge pattern (24) wherein the location of the maximum fluid discharge is offset from the center of the fluid discharge pattern (24) comprising the steps:

forming a nozzle blank (38) with an internal fluid flow passageway having a longitudinal axis (48) and which terminates in a substantially hemispherical dome shaped end wall,

forming a discharge orifice in the end wall (42) of the nozzle by forming in overlying relation a first relatively rounder opening and a second relatively more elongated opening [deleted: characterised by forming][deleted: ]said first opening being formed by a cutting operation centred on and performed in a first plane relative to the longitudinal axis of said fluid flow passageway and [deleted: forming][deleted: ]said second opening being formed by a cutting operation centred on and performed in a second plane at an angle relative to the first plane such that the fluid discharge pattern (24) thereby produced by the discharge orifice (36) has a continuous non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern (24), characterized in that a plane of the cutting operation of said second opening extends at an acute anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and a plane of the cutting operation of the first opening extends in the same direction at an acute anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane such that the angle lambda of the cutting operation of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of cutting operation of the first opening."

VIII. The following documents of the opposition proceedings are relevant for the present decision:

D7: US-A-3 697 313

D9: US-A-2 971 250

D10: US-A-3 737 108

D7 and D10 are cited in the contested patent, paragraph [0007].

IX. The appellant argued essentially as follows:

Main request

Claim 1 is unclear since the features: "the plane of the [first/second] opening extends" imply that said openings lie in a plane, contradictory to what actually happens when cutting across a dome with shaped cutting tools as disclosed in the contested patent.

Auxiliary request 5 amended

The amendments performed in claim 1 stating that the openings are "formed in a plane" do not allow, at first sight, to overcome the outstanding objection of lack of clarity. Therefore the Board, exercising its discretionary power, should not admit the late-filed auxiliary request 5 amended in the proceedings.

Auxiliary request 10

The only distinguishing features of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 over the closest prior art document D10 are those specified in the characterising portion, namely that a plane of the cutting operation of said second opening extends at an acute anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and a plane of the cutting operation of the first opening extends in the same direction at an acute anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane such that the angle lambda of the cutting operation of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of cutting operation of the first opening.

Since the technical effects associated with these features are the same as in D10, the problem to be solved can only be to provide an alternative spray nozzle. The skilled person using his common general knowledge will, in view of the form of the container to be coated, adapt the fluid discharge pattern to be produced accordingly and, hence, with simple trial and error arrive at the claimed subject-matter in an obvious manner.

X. The respondent argued essentially as follows:

Main request

The skilled person using the description of the contested patent, a mind willing to understand and his common general knowledge will realise that the features: "the plane of the [first/second] opening extends" relate to the planes of the cutting operations. Thus, claim 1 of the main request is clear.

Auxiliary request 5 amended

The amendments introduced to claim 1 clarify that the planes under discussion are the planes of the respective cutting operations so that claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 amended is clear.

Auxiliary request 10

Neither the features of the characterising portion of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 nor the fact that the discharge orifice has a continuous non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern are disclosed in D10. These distinguishing features are associated with the problem to be solved of providing an improved fluid discharge pattern not obtained in the prior art. Since the skilled person not only has no pointer in the cited prior art toward the claimed solution, but would even be working against an established prejudice, inventive step has to be acknowledged.

1. Main request

1.1 In the annex to the summons for oral proceedings (see point 5.1.2) the Board raised an objection of lack of clarity against claim 1 of the main request in view of the following features:

- "the plane of the first opening extends"; and

- "the plane of said second opening extends".

These features, introduced in claim 1 during the opposition proceedings, imply that the first and second openings now lie in a plane (which is by definition flat).

However, since the cutting of the opening of the spray nozzle according to the invention is performed with a V-shaped or a curved cutting tool (see figures 8, 10, 11 and 13 and independent process claim 11 of the application as originally filed), i.e. not necessarily a tool which is straight over the width of the opening, the openings cannot be contained in a (single) plane and, a fortiori, the plane of each of the openings cannot extend "at an angle" (be it delta or lambda). The contour of an opening resulting from a V-shaped or a curved cutting tool, as it is done in the contested patent, is inevitably three-dimensional, which is contradictory to the above features of claim 1 (Article 84 EPC).

1.2 This was illustrated at the oral proceedings before the Board by a tennis ball brought by the appellant. The tennis ball representing a dome shape had been cut across as if by a V-shaped cutting tool. The contours of the corresponding opening had indeed a complex three-dimensional shape, which could not be comprised in a single plane.

1.3 The respondent admitted that the openings as defined in claim 1 are not comprised in a plane. It argued that the skilled person will, however, interpret the claim in a logical sense. He will use the description of the contested patent to understand the meaning of the planes under discussion as corresponding to a direction, more particularly the moving direction of the tool. Using his common general knowledge the skilled reader willing to understand the invention will then realise what falls within the claim and what not. The respondent, citing D7, column 5, lines 30-44, further alleged that the prior art also used the same terminology.

1.4 The Board could not share the respondent's view for the reasons also put forward by the appellant during the oral proceedings.

Should both first and second openings be respectively in a plane, as claimed, then the dome would have to be completely cut away. In that case there would be a contradiction within the claim since the second opening could not be more elongated than the first opening as claimed. As a matter of fact, the cutting of a hemispherical dome can only lead to an opening in circular form, whatever the angle followed by the cutting tool during the cutting operation.

In fact, as already discussed above, the openings according to the contested patent are obtained by shaped cutting tools (see figures 8, 10, 11 and 13), especially the second opening which is obtained by a forming tool with a cutting edge tapering to a sharp point (see independent process claim 11 of the application as originally filed and figure 13). Neither the first nor the second opening can therefore be in a plane, contrary to claim 1. The three-dimensional nature of the contours of the openings is further confirmed by the fact that, according to the contested patent, paragraph [0022], they can be obtained by "plunging" a cutting tool, i.e. not necessarily by cutting across the dome, so that even the moving direction of the tool during the cutting operation cannot help in defining a plane according to claim 1.

With respect to the prior art, it was pointed out during the oral proceedings that D7 does not disclose a plane for the opening but rather that the movement of the cutting tools is within a plane.

2. Auxiliary request 5 amended

2.1 In an attempt to overcome the lack of clarity objection, the respondent filed during the oral proceedings before the Board an amended auxiliary request 5 replacing the former auxiliary request 5.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 amended comprises the feature that the first and second openings are "formed in a plane", to replace the feature that the plane of the first and second opening "extends".

2.2 In view of the late filing of auxiliary request 5 amended, its admission in the proceedings is subject to the discretionary power of the Board as defined in Article 13(1) RPBA.

2.3 The respondent argued that the amendments clarify that the openings are in the plane of the cutting operation. The skilled person will have no difficulty to understand, especially in view of the description of the contested patent, paragraphs [0023] and [0027], and claim 11 of the application as originally filed, that the tools are moving during the cutting operations along planes which form the openings, as now defined in claim 1.

2.4 The Board could not share the respondent's view for the reason put forward by the appellant, namely that the wording "formed in a plane" still implies that the openings lie in a single plane, i.e. are two-dimensional, which is actually not the case as discussed under point 1 above (Article 84 EPC).

2.5 As a consequence, auxiliary request 5 amended was not admitted in the proceedings since it did not overcome prima facie the outstanding objection of lack of clarity (Article 13(1) RPBA).

3. Auxiliary request 10

3.1 During the oral proceedings it was concluded that none of the objections raised pursuant to Articles 83, 84 and 123(2) EPC in respect of the previously discussed requests would hold against auxiliary request 10. In particular, the further qualification of the angles to be "acute" is derivable from figures 7 and 12, showing also the cutting direction.

3.2 It was also noted that, as a result of the deletion of the features: "the plane of the [first/second] opening extends" (see point 1.1 above), the scope of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 would appear broader than that of the corresponding process claim 10 of the patent as maintained by the Opposition Division. As a matter of fact, the openings in claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 would not be required to be in a plane any longer, so that the amendments would seem to be contrary to the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius.

However, these features had been introduced in claim 1 of the patent as granted during the opposition proceedings and considered allowable by the Opposition Division. As they were considered in appeal to contravene the requirements of Article 84 EPC (see point 1 above), the respondent replaced them in the process claim 10 by the planes of the cutting operations. The Board found that these amendments allowed the respondent to overcome the lack of clarity objections and further did not contravene the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC. This was not contested by the appellant.

In the light of the discussion at the oral proceedings, it further appeared that these were the only possible amendments for solving the clarity issue, so that they could be regarded as falling within the second type of admissible amendments as an exception to the prohibition of reformatio in peius as established in decision G 1/99 (OJ EPO 2001, 381). This was again not contested by the appellant.

3.3 Novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 was also not contested by the appellant. It contested inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1 in the light of the teaching of document D10 and the skilled person's common general knowledge.

3.4 The Board agreed with the parties to select D10 as the closest prior art for the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 since it relates to the same technical field, namely spray nozzles for use in container coating operations, and aims at the same goal of producing an asymmetrical distribution of the fluid discharge (contested patent, [0001]; D10, column 3, lines 5-29).

3.5 Disclosure of D10

3.5.1 Document D10 (column 3, line 5 to column 7, line 17; column 8, line 19 to column 9, line 55; figures 1-8, 11-16) discloses a process for producing a spray nozzle which has an asymmetrically distributed fluid discharge pattern (H, L in figures 8 and 16) wherein the location of the maximum fluid discharge (point 10 in figures 8 and 16) is offset from the center of the fluid discharge pattern comprising the steps:

- forming a nozzle blank (B) with an internal fluid flow passageway having a longitudinal axis (a-a) and which terminates in a substantially hemispherical dome shaped end wall (D),

- forming a discharge orifice (O) in the end wall (D) of the nozzle by forming in overlying relation a first relatively rounder opening (O") and a second relatively more elongated opening (O'), said first opening (O") being formed by a cutting operation centred on and performed in a first plane (61) relative to the longitudinal axis (a-a) of said fluid flow passageway and said second opening (O') being formed by a cutting operation centred on and performed in a second plane (37) at an angle relative to the first plane such that the fluid discharge pattern thereby produced by the discharge orifice (O) has a continuous non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge (point 10) to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern (see figures 8 and 16).

In D10, the plane (37) of the cutting operation of said second opening (O') extends at an anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane (36) extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (a-a) (see figures 1a and 2) and the plane (61) of the cutting operation of the first opening (O") extends in the same direction at an anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane (36) (see figures 1b and 2a) such that the angle lambda of the cutting operation of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of the cutting operation of the first opening.

As admitted and argued by the parties, the disclosed spray nozzle shown in figures 1, 2, 2a comprises the following anticlockwise angles:

angle lambda = 7,5° (figure 2);

angle delta = 150° (figure 2a)

so that: delta > lambda , contrary to claim 1.

Viewing the very same disclosed spray nozzle from the other side of the sheet of paper on which said figures are printed, which is a symmetry plane (i.e. looking through the paper held against the light), leads to the following anticlockwise angles:

angle lambda' = 172,5° (figure 2);

angle delta' = 30° (figure 2a)

so that: lambda' > delta' , fulfilling the conditions set in claim 1. The Board considers that the disclosure in these figures, as they are, leads to the skilled person also being informed about the above mentioned "rear-view" of the nozzle, since the latter can be observed from both sides.

However, in the thus disclosed spray nozzle, at least one of the angles is obtuse.

The same applies to the embodiments shown in figures 11, 12 and 13 for which anticlockwise e.g. in figure 12:

angle lambda = 0°;

angle delta = 16,5°

so that: delta > lambda , contrary to claim 1.

Viewing the very same disclosed spray nozzle of figure 12 from the other side of the sheet of paper, which is a symmetry plane, leads to the following anticlockwise angles:

angle lambda' = 180°; and

angle delta' = 164,5°

in other words: lambda' > delta', fulfilling the conditions set in claim 1.

However, in the thus disclosed spray nozzle, both angles are obtuse.

Consequently, D10 does not disclose that both angles are acute angles when the relation lambda > delta is satisfied, so that the subject-matter of claim 1 is novel over D10 (Article 54(1) EPC).

3.5.2 The respondent contested that the fluid discharge pattern in D10 has a non-linear taper in the amount of fluid discharged from the location of maximum discharge to at least a point of minimum flow at one end of the discharge pattern.

It considered that the disclosure of D10 as a whole should be taken into account. In particular, figures 8 and 16 of D10 should not be interpreted in isolation but in the light of the description. There, column 4, lines 37-46, makes explicitly clear that the fluid discharge pattern shown in figure 8 tapers "substantially linearly". The term "substantially" is used in order to include the tolerance of ±5% in variation at producing a linear distribution as described in column 4, lines 41-42. Since the aim in D10 is unambiguously to produce a linear fluid discharge pattern, the skilled reader will thus immediately understand that the fluid discharge pattern of the nozzles in D10, even those shown in figures 8 and 16, is linear. Consequently, the feature of claim 1 related to the non-linearity of the fluid discharge pattern should be considered as a distinguishing feature over D10.

3.5.3 The Board could not share the respondent's view for the reasons also put forward by the appellant during the oral proceedings.

Firstly, the fluid discharge patterns shown in figures 8 and 16 of D10 are clearly non-linear on both sides of the maximum discharge point. Secondly, the mentioned passage of D10, column 4, lines 37-51, makes a distinction between the "linear" fluid discharge pattern in figure 10 according to the prior art of D10 and the "substantially linear" fluid discharge pattern according to the invention of D10 as appearing in figures 8 and 16. Should the author of D10 have regarded the distribution according to the invention "linear", he would have used the same terminology as for its prior art, namely "linear". Since he chose to use the expression "substantially linear", he clearly wished to distinguish the fluid discharge pattern of his invention from that of the cited prior art, i.e. to render it for the skilled reader directly and unambiguously non-linear on both sides of the maximum discharge point.

It is further emphasized that the expression "considerable non-linear taper" used by the respondent in its written submissions in order to describe the fluid discharge pattern according to the contested patent is not in claim 1. In any case, this expression is vague and has a relative meaning (see also impugned decision, point 8.4.4). The same applies to the suggestion that the invention clearly achieves a concave curve in the fluid discharge pattern, which is not claimed either.

3.5.4 In D10 the second opening is obtained first (first cut of figures 1a and 2) and the first opening thereafter (second cut of figures 1b and 2a). This cannot lead, however, to a distinguishing feature of the claimed process over D10, since the sequence of steps - which of the openings is performed first - is not specified in claim 1 of auxiliary request 10. This appears clearly from claims 10 and 11 of auxiliary request 10 (respectively claims 21 and 22 of the patent as granted).

3.6 Distinguishing features

As a result of the above, the only distinguishing features of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 over D10 are those of the characterising portion:

a plane of the cutting operation of said second opening extends at an acute anticlockwise angle lambda relative to a plane extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and a plane of the cutting operation of the first opening extends in the same direction at an acute anticlockwise angle delta relative to the perpendicular plane such that the angle lambda of the cutting operation of the second opening is larger than the angle delta of cutting operation of the first opening.

3.7 Technical effect

3.7.1 The technical effect of the above distinguishing features is to enable the application of a thin, even coat on all of the interior surfaces of a container (contested patent, [0006]; [0008]; column 5, line 53 to column 6, line 5).

3.8 Problem to be solved

3.8.1 This technical effect is, however, as discussed during the oral proceedings, the same as that achieved by the spray nozzle of D10 (column 3, lines 5-29; column 4, lines 25-36; figures 8 and 16; see also the impugned decision, points 8.4.3 and 8.4.4; appellant's letter dated 16 December 2011, paragraph bridging pages 2 and 3).

Consequently, the problem to be solved by the distinguishing features can only be regarded as to provide an alternative spray nozzle to that of D10 for producing the same result, namely a thin, even coat on the interior surfaces of containers.

3.8.2 The respondent argued that the problem to be solved should be regarded as to provide a spray nozzle allowing to produce an improved fluid discharge pattern as claimed, i.e. an asymmetric, continuous and non-linear one (contested patent, [0018]).

The Board could not share this view since, as discussed above, the fluid discharge pattern of D10 is also asymmetric, continuous and non-linear.

3.9 Obviousness

3.9.1 The Board concurs with the appellant that the skilled person knows that a rounder/wider opening will provide more fluid than a more elongated/narrower opening at a given location. Consequently, depending on the form of the internal surface of the container to be coated, the skilled person will immediately consider to vary the relative orientations of the two superposed openings with respect to each other, in order to obtain the desired amount of coating where it is needed, i.e. a fluid discharge pattern adapted to said internal surface. D10 itself teaches for that purpose to change the inclination of any cut through the dome, including to tip the bottom line (60) of the cut, so as to diminish the size effect of O" in relation to O' in the orifice O (column 7, lines 11-17). Therefore, after a process of simple trial and error for producing the desired fluid discharge pattern, the skilled person will inevitably arrive at the claimed solution of acute angles delta and lambda with lambda larger than delta. As a consequence, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 does not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).

3.9.2 The respondent argued that there is no pointer in the cited prior art toward this solution, so that inventive step has to be acknowledged. Further, the claimed solution is even contrary to an established prejudice in the technical field as illustrated by D7, D10 and D9, of having at least one of the angles obtuse when lambda is larger than delta.

3.9.3 Contrary to the respondent's view, the Board considers that there is no need in the present case for a pointer to the solution in the available prior art since the solution resides in the skilled person merely applying his common general knowledge when faced with the less ambitious objective technical problem of finding an alternative nozzle as set out under point 3.8.1 above.

Further, for the patent documents D7, D9 and D10 to be evidence of a technical prejudice against having both angles acute in the same anticlockwise direction, it would have required them to be more explicit in that respect. To the Board, they are supporting evidence of the skilled person's trial-and-error approach to the design of spray nozzles.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility